Using stakeholders' perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area

被引:58
|
作者
Francisco Carcamo, P. [1 ,2 ]
Garay-Fluehmann, Rosa [3 ]
Squeo, Francisco A. [4 ,5 ,8 ]
Gaymer, Carlos F. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Norte, Dept Biol Marina, Programa Doctorado Biol & Ecol Aplicada, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[2] Inst Foment Pesquero, Dept Medio Ambiente, Coquimbo, Chile
[3] Univ Santo Tomas, Ctr Aprendizaje, La Serena 1068, Chile
[4] Univ La Serena, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, La Serena, Chile
[5] Ctr Estudios Avanzados Zonas Aridas, La Serena, Chile
[6] Univ Catolica Norte, Dept Biol Marina, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[7] Ctr Estudios Avanzados Zonas Aridas, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
[8] Inst Ecol & Biodiversidad, Santiago, Chile
[9] Millennium Nucleus Ecol & Sustainable Management, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Biodiversity; Chile; Ecosystem services; Fishermen; Multiple-Use Coastal Marine; Protected Area; Stakeholders' perceptions; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; FISHERIES; RESERVES; IMPACTS; OPPORTUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The definition of a common vision that includes social and environmental goals, ecosystem services and/or biodiversity features that people are interested in maintaining or restoring is a great challenge for marine protected areas (MPAs). Recent initiatives have promoted broadening the focus from biodiversity conservation alone to the conservation of both ecosystem services and biodiversity, indicating that this integration should improve support and compliance from stakeholders. Using a Multiple-Use Coastal Marine Protected Area recently proposed in northern Chile, we investigated (i) stakeholders' perceptions of the valuation of ecosystem services, threats to their provision, and the prioritization of ecosystem services, biodiversity features, and uses in a planning scenario, and (ii) stakeholders' expectations for the establishment of a new MPA. The perceptions of different groups of stakeholders were compared and statistically analyzed, and the relationships among prioritizations were studied using a network approach. Stakeholders identified and valued 13 ecosystem services, 28 biodiversity features, 20 uses and activities, and 22 threats. Significant differences among the valuations and prioritizations of different stakeholder groups were attributable principally to artisanal fishermen's perceptions of some components that are directly related to their activities and livelihoods. High expectations of benefits from a new MPA implementation were observed for all categories of stakeholders. To relate the different valuated components, we proposed a network-based conceptual model that reduces complexity, and also as a strategy to communicate relationships and trade-offs occurring in this particular social-ecological system to the several stakeholders. We strongly recommend early stakeholder engagement so as to understand the variability in environmental perceptions and then reflect that variation in the planning and management actions of MPAs, thus improving support for their implementation and achieving conservation and societal goals. Our findings indicate that stakeholders' perceptions and prioritizadons of ecosystem services, biodiversity features and uses should be used as the basis for starting the MPA implementation and planning process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 131
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biodiversity provides ecosystem services: scientific results versus stakeholders' knowledge
    Lugnot, M.
    Martin, G.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2013, 13 (06) : 1145 - 1155
  • [22] Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services
    Palumbi, Stephen R.
    Sandifer, Paul A.
    Allan, J. David
    Beck, Michael W.
    Fautin, Daphne G.
    Fogarty, Michael J.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Incze, Lewis S.
    Leong, Jo-Ann
    Norse, Elliott
    Stachowicz, John J.
    Wall, Diana H.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (04) : 204 - 211
  • [23] Assessing cultural ecosystem services of a large marine protected area through social media photographs
    Retka, Jared
    Jepson, Paul
    Ladle, Richard J.
    Malhado, Ana C. M.
    Vieira, Felipe A. S.
    Normande, Iran C.
    Souza, Carolina N.
    Bragagnolo, Chiara
    Correia, Ricardo A.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 176 : 40 - 48
  • [24] Exploring dual discount rates for ecosystem services: Evidence from a marine protected area network
    Vasquez-Lavin, Felipe
    Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.
    Ignacio Hernandez, Jose
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Carrasco, Moises
    Quiroga, Miguel
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 55 : 63 - 80
  • [25] Mapping recreational ecosystem services from stakeholders' perspective in the Azores
    Seijo, Cristina
    Calado, Helena
    McClintock, William J.
    Gil, Artur
    Fonseca, Catarina
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2021, 6
  • [26] Using Stakeholders' Perception to Evaluate the Prospects of Establishing Marine Protected Areas in the Niger Delta Coastal Ecosystem
    Okeke, Ebuka Benedict
    Obodoefuna, Somadina Mmaduakonam
    Uddin, Mohammad Mazbah
    Huang, Lingfeng
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 50 (02) : 106 - 123
  • [27] Enhancing protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau
    Li, Shicheng
    Zhang, Heng
    Zhou, Xuewu
    Yu, Haibin
    Li, Wangjun
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 43
  • [28] Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity in Natural Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [29] Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Segan, Daniel B.
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Beger, Maria
    Watson, James E. M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [30] Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
    Carissa J. Klein
    Christopher J. Brown
    Benjamin S. Halpern
    Daniel B. Segan
    Jennifer McGowan
    Maria Beger
    James E.M. Watson
    Scientific Reports, 5