Human Research Ethics Committees in Technical Universities

被引:5
|
作者
Koepsell, David [1 ]
Brinkman, Willem-Paul [1 ]
Pont, Sylvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
engineering; design; research ethics; human subjects; technical university;
D O I
10.1177/1556264614540596
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Human research ethics has developed in both theory and practice mostly from experiences in medical research. Human participants, however, are used in a much broader range of research than ethics committees oversee, including both basic and applied research at technical universities. Although mandated in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, non-medical research involving humans need not receive ethics review in much of Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Our survey of the top 50 technical universities in the world shows that, where not specifically mandated by law, most technical universities do not employ ethics committees to review human studies. As the domains of basic and applied sciences expand, ethics committees are increasingly needed to guide and oversee all such research regardless of legal requirements. We offer as examples, from our experience as an ethics committee in a major European technical university, ways in which such a committee provides needed services and can help ensure more ethical studies involving humans outside the standard medical context. We provide some arguments for creating such committees, and in our supplemental article, we provide specific examples of cases and concerns that may confront technical, engineering, and design research, as well as outline the general framework we have used in creating our committee.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethics Creep or Governance Creep?: Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS)
    Gorman S.M.
    [J]. Monash Bioethics Review, 2011, 29 (4) : 23 - 38
  • [42] Research ethics committees: Agents of research policy?
    Hemminki E.
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 3 (1)
  • [43] ETHICS COMMITTEES OR COMMITTEES OF ETHICS
    TRIAS, MAB
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 1992, 98 (10): : 399 - 399
  • [44] Articulation and transparency of decision-making by human research ethics committees
    Davies, Grant
    Gillam, Lynn
    [J]. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2007, 26 (1-2) : 46 - 56
  • [45] Overall Assessment of Human Research and Ethics Committees in the United Arab Emirates
    Abdulrahman, Mahera
    Nair, Satish Chandrasekhar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2017, 12 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [46] Human research ethics committees members: ethical review personal perceptions
    Handal, Boris
    Campbell, Chris
    Watson, Kevin
    Maher, Marguerite
    Brewer, Keagan
    Irwin, Anne-Marie
    Fellman, Marc
    [J]. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2021, 39 (01) : 94 - 114
  • [47] Human research ethics committees members: ethical review personal perceptions
    Boris Handal
    Chris Campbell
    Kevin Watson
    Marguerite Maher
    Keagan Brewer
    Anne-Marie Irwin
    Marc Fellman
    [J]. Monash Bioethics Review, 2021, 39 : 94 - 114
  • [48] Research involving Human Subjects - Principles and Challenges for the Work of Ethics Committees
    Pigeot, Iris
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    Rauch, Geraldine
    [J]. BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2019, 62 (06) : 679 - 681
  • [49] HOLDING HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES TO ACCOUNT: A ROLE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW?
    McWhirter, Rebekah
    [J]. ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW, 2022, 43 (01): : 377 - 402
  • [50] Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
    McGuinness, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (09) : 695 - 700