Open market innovation

被引:11
|
作者
Rigby, D [1 ]
Zook, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Bain & Co, Boston, MA 02116 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Companies in many industries are feeling immense pressure to improve their ability to innovate. Even in these tough economic times, executives have pushed innovation initiatives to the top of their priority lists, but they know that the best ideas aren't always coming out of their own R&D labs. That's why a growing number of companies are exploring the idea of open-market innovation-an approach that uses tools such as licensing,joint ventures, and strategic alliances to bring the benefits of free trade to the flow of new ideas. For instance, when faced with the unanticipated anthrax scare last fall, Pitney Bowes had nothing in its R&D pipeline to help its customers combat the deadly spores. So it sought help from outside innovators to come up with scanning and imaging technologies that could alert its customers to tainted letters and packages. And Dow Chemical and Cargill jointly produced a new form of plastic derived from plant starches-a breakthrough product that neither company could have created on its own. In this article, Bain consultants Darrell Rigby and Chris Zook describe the advantages and disadvantages of open-market innovation and the ways some companies are using it to gain competitive advantage. By importing ideas from the outside, the authors say, companies can collect more and better ideas from different kinds of experts. Creative types within a company will stick around longer if they know their ideas will eventually find a home-as internal R&D projects or as concepts licensed to outside buyers. Exporting ideas also gives companies a way to measure an innovation's real value. However, the authors warn against entering into open-market innovation without properly structuring deals: Xerox and TRW virtually gave away their innovations and had to stand by while other companies capitalized on them.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reverse open innovation: open innovation as a relevant factor for reverse innovation
    Cortonesi, Pedro
    Cahen, Fernanda Ribeiro
    Borini, Felipe Mendes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2019, 26 (01) : 94 - 114
  • [22] OPEN INNOVATION IN EDUCATION: THE OPEN DESIGN INNOVATION PROJECT
    Santos, Carlos Oliveira
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN11), 2011, : 344 - 353
  • [23] Open innovation
    Richard Hodson
    [J]. Nature, 2016, 533 : S53 - S53
  • [24] Open innovation
    Carlsson, Sven
    Corvello, Vincenzo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 14 (04)
  • [25] Open innovation
    Ball, A
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (03) : 338 - 339
  • [26] Open minds, open innovation
    Phillips, Jeremy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2012, 7 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [27] Open to Innovation
    Livingstone, Paul
    [J]. R&D MAGAZINE, 2012, 54 (03): : 16 - 18
  • [28] OPEN INNOVATION
    Hodson, Richard
    [J]. NATURE, 2016, 533 (7602) : S53 - S53
  • [29] Open Innovation
    Vera Franco, Piedad Ysidora
    Puente Tituana, Silvia Paulina
    Espinoza Cume, Ana Isabel
    [J]. REVISTA PUBLICANDO, 2016, 3 (08): : 597 - 607
  • [30] Internal and external antecedents of open innovation adoption in IT organisations: insights from an emerging market
    Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Sarwar, Aisha
    Pellicelli, Anna Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (07) : 1726 - 1744