Maryland, the Power Plant Research Program, and the Chesapeake Bay watershed

被引:7
|
作者
Patty, SS
Roth, N
Mountain, D
机构
[1] Maryland Dept Nat Resources, Power Plant Res Program, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
[2] Versar Inc, Columbia, MD 21045 USA
[3] Environm Resources Management, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
关键词
restoration; conservation biology; power generation; NOx emissions; pollutant deposition; nutrient deposition; watershed; toxics deposition; hydroelectric; anadromous fish; steam electric; combustion by-product; transmission line; energy environmental issues; integrated assessments; biodiversity conservation; cumulative landscape analysis; ecological conditions; integrated indicators; ecological condition; cumulative watershed impacts;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00323-X
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chesapeake Bay has long been recognized as a biologically rich ecosystem, one whose wide expanse of shallow estuarine waters is unique in the world. When the biological bounty of the Bay declined dramatically, federal, state, and local governments began restoration efforts on a mammoth scale. While the successes have been many, the lesson of the last few decades has been that this great estuary cannot be restored without addressing the multitude of human activities in the watershed that cumulatively distort its ecological processes and degrade its resources. Today governments, industry, and the public are focusing on three major restoration efforts: reducing nutrient inputs, reducing toxic pollutant loads, and restoring living resources. Recognizing that power generation is an important component of the activities affecting the Bay, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Power Plant Research Program (PPRP) is working in partnership with electric utilities to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts on both local and regional scales. Historically, PPRP has participated in cooperative state and industry efforts at Conowingo Dam and other upstream dams on the Susquehanna River (the Bay's largest freshwater tributary) that have helped quantify impacts to migratory fish, resulting in modifications to dam operations and installation of fish lifts to restore populations of American shad and other anadromous fish. Other restoration projects include mitigation of acid mine drainage in the upper reaches of the watershed, installation of lime dosers in affected streams, investigation of the beneficial uses of coal combustion products for mine reclamation, and operation of a successful hatchery and release program. Currently, PPRP recognizes that its research efforts need to look up the watershed at cumulative effects on a regional scale. Recent research on the regional level undertaken by DNR includes a statewide biological stream survey to provide comprehensive baseline information on the health of freshwater systems in Maryland, and development of reference-based ecological indicators. These indicators are critical for assessing the effects of different degrading activities and measuring progress towards environmental goals. A related cumulative impact model, currently under development, will couple indicators of biological integrity with spatial data on land uses, power-related impacts, and other anthropogenic stressors to evaluate watershed impacts on aquatic systems. As part of model development, the role of vegetated riparian corridors is being evaluated to support watershed-wide initiatives to restore riparian forest buffers on Chesapeake Bay tributaries. These biological survey data and other information are being used to identify biodiversity hotspots in the State and construct maps of ecologically sensitive areas for the evaluation of cumulative effects and targeting of conservation and restoration priorities. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OYSTER RESTORATION IN THE MARYLAND PORTION OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: MEASURES OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE
    Paynter, Kennedy
    Allen, Steven
    Lane, Hillary
    Meritt, Donald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2011, 30 (02): : 542 - 542
  • [42] The Oyster Question: Scientists, Watermen, and the Maryland Chesapeake Bay since 1880
    Pillsbury, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY, 2011, 77 (02) : 453 - 454
  • [43] Stability of the blue crab stock in Maryland's portion of Chesapeake Bay
    Uphoff, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (02): : 519 - 528
  • [44] Examining the dependence of macroplastic fragmentation on coastal processes (Chesapeake Bay, Maryland)
    Rizzo, Marzia
    Corbau, Corinne
    Lane, Benjamin
    Malkin, Sairah Y.
    Bezzi, Virginia
    Vaccaro, Carmela
    Nardin, William
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2021, 169
  • [45] An ecological risk assessment of tributyltin in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
    Hall, LW
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U590 - U590
  • [46] Performance and economics of BNR plants in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA
    Randall, CW
    Cokgor, EU
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (09) : 21 - 28
  • [47] The Oyster Question: Scientists, Watermen, and the Maryland Chesapeake Bay since 1880
    Benson, Keith R.
    [J]. HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE LIFE SCIENCES, 2011, 33 (03): : 421 - 422
  • [48] The Oyster Question: Scientists, Watermen, and the Maryland Chesapeake Bay since 1880
    Paolisso, Michael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND HISTORY, 2012, 18 (02) : 283 - 285
  • [49] RELATIONS OF WINTERING CANVASBACKS TO ENVIRONMENTAL-POLLUTANTS - CHESAPEAKE BAY, MARYLAND
    WHITE, DH
    STENDELL, RC
    MULHERN, BM
    [J]. WILSON BULLETIN, 1979, 91 (02): : 279 - 287
  • [50] STATISTICAL MODELING OF HISTORIC SHORE EROSION RATES ON THE CHESAPEAKE BAY IN MARYLAND
    SPOERI, RK
    ZABAWA, CF
    COULOMBE, B
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY AND WATER SCIENCES, 1985, 7 (03): : 171 - 187