A Novel Quantitative Multiplex Tissue Immunoblotting for Biomarkers Predicts a Prostate Cancer Aggressive Phenotype

被引:11
|
作者
Zhu, Guangjing [1 ]
Liu, Zhi [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [2 ]
Davis, Christine [1 ]
Christudass, Christhunesa S. [1 ]
Carter, H. Ballentine [1 ]
Landis, Patricia [1 ]
Zhang, Hui [2 ]
Chung, Joon-Yong [3 ]
Hewitt, Stephen M. [3 ]
Miller, M. Craig
Veltri, Robert W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] NCI, Expt Pathol Lab, Pathol Lab, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
DECISION CURVE ANALYSIS; HER-2/NEU EXPRESSION; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; NATURAL-HISTORY; RISK; GLYCOPROTEINS; PROGRESSION; RECURRENCE; CALCIUM;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0496
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Early prediction of disease progression in men with very low-risk (VLR) prostate cancer who selected active surveillance (AS) rather than immediate treatment could reduce morbidity associated with overtreatment. Methods: We evaluated the association of six biomarkers [Periostin, (-5, -7) proPSA, CACNA1D, HER2/neu, EZH2, and Ki-67] with different Gleason scores and biochemical recurrence (BCR) on prostate cancer TMAs of 80 radical prostatectomy (RP) cases. Multiplex tissue immunoblotting (MTI) was used to assess these biomarkers in cancer and adjacent benign areas of 5 mm sections. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) was applied to model our results. Results: In the RP cases, CACNA1D, HER2/neu, and Periostin expression were significantly correlated with aggressive phenotype in cancer areas. An MLR model in the cancer area yielded a ROC-AUC = 0.98, whereas in cancer-adjacent benign areas, yielded a ROC-AUC = 0.94. CACNA1D and HER2/neu expression combined with Gleason score in a MLR model yielded a ROC-AUC = 0.79 for BCR prediction. In the small biopsies from an AS cohort of 61 VLR cases, an MLR model for prediction of progressors at diagnosis retained (-5, -7) proPSA and CACNA1D, yielding a ROC-AUC of 0.78, which was improved to 0.82 after adding tPSA into the model. Conclusions: The molecular profile of biomarkers is capable of accurately predicting aggressive prostate cancer on retrospective RP cases and identifying potential aggressive prostate cancer requiring immediate treatment on the AS diagnostic biopsy but limited in BCR prediction. Impact: Comprehensive profiling of biomarkers using MTI predicts prostate cancer aggressive phenotype in RP and AS biopsies. (C) 2015 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1864 / 1872
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oxidative stress is inherent in prostate cancer cells and mediates aggressive phenotype
    Kumar, Binod
    Koul, Sweaty
    Khandrika, Lakshmipathi
    Meacham, Randall B.
    Koul, Hari K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 192 - 193
  • [42] NY-ESO-1 expression predicts an aggressive phenotype of ovarian cancer
    Szender, J. Brian
    Papanicolau-Sengos, Antonios
    Eng, Kevin H.
    Miliotto, Anthony J.
    Lugade, Amit A.
    Gnjatic, Sacha
    Matsuzaki, Junko
    Morrison, Carl D.
    Odunsi, Kunle
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 (03) : 420 - 425
  • [43] High Keratin 8/18 Ratio Predicts Aggressive Hepatocellular Cancer Phenotype
    Golob-Schwarzi, Nicole
    Bettermann, Kira
    Mehta, Anita Kuldeep
    Kessler, Sonja M.
    Unterluggauer, Julia
    Krassnig, Stefanie
    Kojima, Kensuke
    Chen, Xintong
    Hoshida, Yujin
    Bardeesy, Nabeel M.
    Mueller, Heimo
    Svendova, Vendula
    Schimek, Michael G.
    Diwoky, Clemens
    Lipfert, Alexandra
    Mahajan, Vineet
    Stumptner, Cornelia
    Thueringer, Andrea
    Froehlich, Leopold F.
    Stojakovic, Tatjana
    Nilsson, K. P. R.
    Kolbe, Thomas
    Ruelicke, Thomas
    Magin, Thomas M.
    Strnad, Pavel
    Kiemer, Alexandra K.
    Moriggl, Richard
    Haybaeck, Johannes
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02): : 256 - 268
  • [44] A panel of selected serum protein biomarkers for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer
    Song, Jin
    Ma, Shiyong
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Eguez, Rodrigo V.
    Hoti, Naseruddin
    Zhang, Hui
    Mohr, Phaedre
    Dua, Renu
    Patil, Dattatraya
    May, Kristen Douglas
    Williams, Sierra
    Arnold, Rebecca
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Chan, Daniel W.
    Zhang, Zhen
    [J]. THERANOSTICS, 2021, 11 (13): : 6214 - 6224
  • [45] Can epigenetic and inflammatory biomarkers identify clinically aggressive prostate cancer?
    Santos, Pedro Bargao
    Patel, Hitendra
    Henrique, Rui
    Felix, Ana
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (02): : 43 - 52
  • [46] Selection of candidate biomarkers for aggressive prostate cancer based on targeted proteomics
    Gao, Yuqian
    Wang, Hui
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Chen, Yongmei
    Schepmoes, Athena
    Petrovics, Gyorgy
    Fillmore, Thomas
    Shi, Tujin
    Qian, Wei-Jun
    Smith, Richard
    Srivastava, Sudhir
    Kagan, Jacob
    Dobi, Albert
    Rodland, Karin
    Srivastava, Shiv
    Liu, Tao
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [47] Novel biomarkers for the prediction of prostate cancer recurrence
    Rosenzweig, C. N.
    Sokoll, L. J.
    Partin, A. W.
    Chan, D. W.
    [J]. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2006, 5 (10) : S271 - S271
  • [48] Clinical and Novel Biomarkers in the Management of Prostate Cancer
    Sanhueza, Cristobal
    Kohli, Manish
    [J]. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (02)
  • [49] Evolution of Novel Biomarkers for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Barbieri, Christopher E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (06): : 1970 - 1971
  • [50] miRNAs as novel biomarkers in the management of prostate cancer
    Filella, Xavier
    Foj, Laura
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 55 (05) : 715 - 736