Evaluation of Attentional Demands During Motor Learning: Validity of a Dual-Task Probe Paradigm

被引:14
|
作者
Goh, Hui-Ting [1 ]
Gordon, James [2 ]
Sullivan, Katherine J. [2 ]
Winstein, Carolee J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ So Calif, Herman Ostrow Sch Dent, Lab Motor Behav & Neurorehabil, Div Biokinesiol & Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
automaticity; secondary task; action preparation; FUNCTIONAL MRI; MOVEMENTS; AUTOMATIZATION; INTERFERENCE; SKILL; EXECUTION; TIME; AUTOMATICITY; METHODOLOGY; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1080/00222895.2013.868337
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the validity of a 2-choice audio-vocal reaction time (RT) probe task for measuring the changes in attentional demand during practice and learning of a discrete motor task. Twenty participants practiced the motor task across 3days and were probed with the RT task during either the preparation or execution phase of the primary task. As practice progressed, participants improved in the primary task performance and shortened the RTs to the probe task. This indicated that less attention was required to plan and execute the movement and suggested that the RT probe task was a sensitive and valid tool to measure changes in attentional demands across practice. The authors implemented several additional experimental controls to address possible confounders including unintentional learning of the probe task, primary-secondary task trade-off effects, and compliance with task priority instructions. These experimental controls further ensured the validity of the probe paradigm and interpretability of the dual-task cost findings. Our experimental methods provided confirmatory evidence for the validity of the 2-choice RT task as a means to assess attentional demands during motor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect Of A Dynamic Dual-Task Paradigm And Concussion History On Motor And Cognitive Performance
    Talarico, Maria
    Ballance, Christopher
    Boucher, Laura
    Onate, James
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 471 - 471
  • [22] Developmental Changes in Executive Control: Investigating Dual-Task Interference During Motor and Central Cognitive Processing with the Overlapping Task Paradigm
    Strobach, Tilo
    Karbach, Julia
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 25 (04) : 549 - 572
  • [23] Effects of Age on Attentional Demands and Postural Control of Obstacle Crossing: Evidence from a Dual-task Approach
    Wei, Ta-Sen
    Huang, Chiu-Jung
    Chen, Shen-Kai
    Guo, Lan-Yuen
    Wu, Wen-Lan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 32 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [24] Auditory probe sensitivity to work-load changes in a complex dual-task paradigm
    Ullsperger, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 30 (1-2) : 68 - 68
  • [25] HEMISPHERIC-ASYMMETRY AND THE DUAL-TASK PARADIGM
    DALEN, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 10 (03) : 318 - 318
  • [26] HEMISPHERIC-ASYMMETRY AND THE DUAL-TASK PARADIGM
    DALEN, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 13 (03) : 443 - 443
  • [27] Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm
    Konishi, Mahiko
    Compain, Clemence
    Berberian, Bruno
    Sackur, Jerome
    de Gardelle, Vincent
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (06) : 1259 - 1268
  • [28] Variability of Postural Coordination in Dual-Task Paradigm
    Azimi, Rezvan
    Abdoli, Behrouz
    Sanjari, Mohammad Ali
    Khosrowabadi, Reza
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2024, 56 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [29] Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm
    Mahiko Konishi
    Clémence Compain
    Bruno Berberian
    Jérôme Sackur
    Vincent de Gardelle
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 1259 - 1268
  • [30] ATTENTIONAL RESOURCES AND HEMISPHERIC INVOLVEMENT IN DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE
    TOWELL, N
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 39 : A11 - A11