Bioactive Glass and Autogenous Bone as Bone Graft Substitutes in Benign Bone Tumors

被引:47
|
作者
Lindfors, Nina C. [1 ]
Heikkila, Jouni T. [2 ]
Koski, Ilona [3 ]
Mattila, Kimmo [3 ]
Aho, Allan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Orthoped & Hand Surg, Helsinki Univ Cent Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Biomat Project Turku, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[3] Med Imaging Ctr SW Finland, Turku, Finland
关键词
bioactive glass; bone substitute; biocompatibility/hard tissue; FOLLOW-UP; CURETTAGE; GRANULES; DEFECTS; CYSTS;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.31263
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In a prospective randomized study, 25 patients with benign bone tumors were surgically treated with either bioactive glass S53P4 (BG) or autogenous bone (AB) as bone graft material. X-rays were taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. In addition, for most of the patients, CT scans were performed at the same time-points. No infections or material-related adverse reactions occurred in any patient. The filled cavity was replaced faster by new bone in the AB group than in the BG group (p = 0.0001). However, at 36 months, no statistical difference in cavity volume between the two groups was observed on X-rays (p = 0.7881) or on CT scans (p = 0.9117). In the BG group at 3 years, the filled cavity appeared, however, dense on X-rays, and glass granules on CT scans were observed. During the follow-up period, the cortical thickness seemed to increase more in the BG group than in the AB group (p < 0.0001). (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 90B: 131-136, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tissue response to bioactive glass and autogenous bone in the rabbit spine
    N. C. Lindfors
    A. J. Aho
    European Spine Journal, 2000, 9 : 30 - 35
  • [22] Tissue response to bioactive glass and autogenous bone in the rabbit spine
    Lindfors, NC
    Aho, AJ
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [23] Tooth as Autogenous Bone Graft
    Prakash, Satya M.
    Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (03): : 185 - 188
  • [24] A comparison of autogenous bone graft combined with deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone graft alone for treatment of alveolar cleft
    Thuaksuban, N.
    Nuntanaranont, T.
    Pripatnanont, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (12) : 1175 - 1180
  • [25] Enriched mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds as bone substitutes in critical diaphyseal bone defects in rabbits
    Garcia-Lamas, Lorena
    Lozano, Daniel
    Jimenez-Diaz, Veronica
    Bravo-Gimenez, Beatriz
    Sanchez-Salcedo, Sandra
    Jimenez-Holguin, Javier
    Abella, Monica
    Desco, Manuel
    Vallet-Regi, Maria
    Cecilia-Lopez, David
    Salinas, Antonio Jesus
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2024, 180 : 104 - 114
  • [26] Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes
    Finkemeier, CG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (03): : 454 - 464
  • [27] Bone grafts and biomaterials used as bone graft substitutes
    Ouhayoun, JP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON PERIODONTOLOGY: CHEMICALS IN PERIODONTICS, 1997, : 313 - 358
  • [28] Role of bone graft substitutes for glenoid bone defects
    Brems, John J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (05) : 282S - 285S
  • [29] Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes
    Ludwig, SC
    Kowalski, JM
    Boden, SD
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (Suppl 1) : S119 - S125
  • [30] Evaluation of bone graft substitutes
    Gouin, F
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1998, 84 : 60 - 63