Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A worldwide review

被引:275
|
作者
Zarrouk, Sadiq J. [1 ]
Moon, Hyungsul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Engn Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Mighty River Power, Rotorua 3040, New Zealand
关键词
Geothermal power plants; Conversion efficiency; Dry steam; Single flash; Double flash; Binary and hybrid plants;
D O I
10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.11.001
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The conversion efficiency of geothermal power developments is generally lower than that of all conventional thermal power plants. Confusion can be found in literature concerning the estimation of this conversion efficiency. Geothermal power plants conversion efficiency estimates that is based on the enthalpy of the produced geothermal fluid can be the most desirable for use during the first estimates of power potential of new wells and for resource estimation studies. The overall conversion efficiency is affected by many parameters including the power plant design (single or double flash, triple flash, dry steam, binary, or hybrid system), size, gas content, dissolved minerals content, parasitic load, ambient conditions and other parameters. This work is a worldwide review using published data from 94 geothermal plants (6 dry-steam, 34 single flash, 18 double flash, 31 binary, 2 hybrid steam-binary and 1 triple flash plant) to find conversion efficiencies based on the reservoir enthalpy. The highest reported conversion efficiency is approximately 21% at the Darajat vapour-dominated system, with a worldwide efficiency average of around 12%. The use of binary plants in low-enthalpy resources has allowed the use of energy from fluid with enthalpy as low as 306 kJ/kg, resulting in a net conversion efficiency of about 1%. A generic geothermal power conversion relation was developed based on the total produced enthalpy. Three more specific correlations are presented for single flash/dry steam plants, double flash plants and binary plants. The conversion efficiency of binary plants has the lowest confidence, mainly because of the common use of air cooling which is highly affected by local and seasonal changes in ambient temperatures. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENERGY COST IN GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS
    Dagdas, Ahmet
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2005, 23 (02): : 84 - 94
  • [22] Next generation geothermal power plants
    Electr Power Res Inst Rep EPRI TR, 106223s
  • [23] Turbines and separators for geothermal power plants
    Moskovskij Energeticheskij Inst, Moscow, Russia
    Teploenerg, 1 (41-47):
  • [24] Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2015 worldwide review
    Lund, John W.
    Boyd, Tonya L.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 60 : 66 - 93
  • [25] Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2010 worldwide review
    Lund, John W.
    Freeston, Derek H.
    Boyd, Tonya L.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2011, 40 (03) : 159 - 180
  • [26] Reinjection in geothermal fields: An updated worldwide review 2020
    Kamila, Zahratul
    Kaya, Eylem
    Zarrouk, Sadiq J.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2021, 89 (89)
  • [27] Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review
    Lund, John W.
    Toth, Aniko N.
    Geothermics, 2021, 90
  • [28] Ideal thermal efficiency for geothermal binary plants
    DiPippo, Ronald
    GEOTHERMICS, 2007, 36 (03) : 276 - 285
  • [29] Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 Worldwide review
    Lund, JW
    Freeston, DH
    Boyd, TL
    GEOTHERMICS, 2005, 34 (06) : 691 - 727
  • [30] Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review
    Lund, John W.
    Toth, Aniko N.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2021, 90