Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications

被引:693
|
作者
Lasser, KE
Allen, PD
Woolhandler, SJ
Himmelstein, DU
Wolfe, SN
Bor, DH
机构
[1] Cambridge Hosp, Dept Med, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Publ Citizen Hlth Res Grp, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.287.17.2215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Recently approved drugs may be more likely to have unrecognized adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than established drugs, but no recent studies have examined how frequently postmarketing surveillance identifies important ADRs. Objective To determine the frequency and timing of discovery of new ADRs described in black box warnings or necessitating withdrawal of the drug from the market. Design and Setting Examination of the Physicians' Desk Reference for all new chemical entities approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 1975 and 1999, and all drugs withdrawn from the market between 1975 and 2000 (with or without a prior black box warning). Main Outcome Measures Frequency of and time to a new black box warning or drug withdrawal. Results A total of 548 new chemical entities were approved in 1975-1999; 56 (10.2%) acquired a new black box warning or were withdrawn. Forty-five drugs (8.2%) acquired 1 or more black box warnings and 16 (2.9%) were withdrawn from the market. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the estimated probability of acquiring a new black box warning or being withdrawn from the market over 25 years was 20%. Eighty-one major changes to drug labeling in the Physicians' Desk Reference occurred including the addition of 1 or more black box warnings per drug, or drug withdrawal. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, half of these changes occurred within 7 years of drug introduction; half of the withdrawals occurred within 2 years. Conclusions Serious ADRs commonly emerge after Food and Drug Administration approval. The safety of new agents cannot be known with certainty until a drug has been on the market for many years.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2220
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The gray areas of black box warnings
    Karch, AM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2006, 106 (06) : 77 - 78
  • [22] New and incremental FDA black box warnings from 2008 to 2015
    Solotke, Michael T.
    Dhruva, Sanket S.
    Downing, Nicholas S.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 17 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [23] Bringing greater transparency to "black box" warnings
    Buckley, Nick A.
    Rossi, Simone
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 49 (06) : 448 - 451
  • [24] Content, Consistency, and Quality of Black Box Warnings
    Cheng, Christine M.
    DeLizza, Colleen
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (01) : 74 - 74
  • [25] Postmarketing surveillance and black box warnings - Reply
    Lasser, KE
    Woolhandler, SJ
    Himmelstein, DU
    Wolfe, SM
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (08): : 958 - 958
  • [26] Canadian ADHD black-box warnings
    Lesage, Alain
    Renaud, Johanne
    Kouassi, Edouard
    Vincent, Philippe
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 2 (12): : 1057 - 1057
  • [27] Role of black box warnings and formulary management
    Cohen, J. P.
    Young, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A376 - A376
  • [29] Primum non nocere and "black box" warnings
    Pearlman, DS
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 117 (01) : 30 - 31
  • [30] BLACK BOX WARNINGS OF ANTIBIOTICS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
    Ahmad, Nehad J.
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (05): : 9054 - 9058