Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications

被引:693
|
作者
Lasser, KE
Allen, PD
Woolhandler, SJ
Himmelstein, DU
Wolfe, SN
Bor, DH
机构
[1] Cambridge Hosp, Dept Med, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Publ Citizen Hlth Res Grp, Washington, DC USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.287.17.2215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Recently approved drugs may be more likely to have unrecognized adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than established drugs, but no recent studies have examined how frequently postmarketing surveillance identifies important ADRs. Objective To determine the frequency and timing of discovery of new ADRs described in black box warnings or necessitating withdrawal of the drug from the market. Design and Setting Examination of the Physicians' Desk Reference for all new chemical entities approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 1975 and 1999, and all drugs withdrawn from the market between 1975 and 2000 (with or without a prior black box warning). Main Outcome Measures Frequency of and time to a new black box warning or drug withdrawal. Results A total of 548 new chemical entities were approved in 1975-1999; 56 (10.2%) acquired a new black box warning or were withdrawn. Forty-five drugs (8.2%) acquired 1 or more black box warnings and 16 (2.9%) were withdrawn from the market. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the estimated probability of acquiring a new black box warning or being withdrawn from the market over 25 years was 20%. Eighty-one major changes to drug labeling in the Physicians' Desk Reference occurred including the addition of 1 or more black box warnings per drug, or drug withdrawal. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, half of these changes occurred within 7 years of drug introduction; half of the withdrawals occurred within 2 years. Conclusions Serious ADRs commonly emerge after Food and Drug Administration approval. The safety of new agents cannot be known with certainty until a drug has been on the market for many years.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2220
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adherence to black box warnings for prescription medications in outpatients
    Lasser, KE
    Seger, DL
    Yu, DT
    Karson, AS
    Fiskio, JM
    Seger, AC
    Shah, NR
    Gandhi, TK
    Rothschild, JM
    Bates, DW
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (03) : 338 - 344
  • [2] Black-Box Warnings of Antiseizure Medications: What is Inside the Box?
    Wahab, Abdul
    Iqbal, Attiya
    PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 37 (03) : 233 - 250
  • [3] Strategies for the Prescription of Psychotropic Drugs with Black Box Warnings
    Stevens, Jonathan R.
    Jarrahzadeh, Tiana
    Brendel, Rebecca Weintraub
    Stern, Theodore A.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2014, 55 (02) : 123 - 133
  • [4] Black-Box Warnings of Antiseizure Medications: What is Inside the Box?
    Abdul Wahab
    Attiya Iqbal
    Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2023, 37 : 233 - 250
  • [5] NEW DRUGS: UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED? LENGTH OF TIME TO BLACK BOX WARNINGS AND WITHDRAWALS FROM 1975 TO 2010
    Frank, Cassie
    Bor, David
    Woolhandler, Steffie
    Himmelstein, David
    Lasser, Karen E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S252 - S253
  • [6] Black box warnings
    Hampton, T
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (04): : 377 - 377
  • [7] Recognition and Knowledge of Medications with Black Box Warnings Among Pediatricians and Emergency Physicians
    Smollin C.G.
    Fu J.
    Levin R.
    Journal of Medical Toxicology, 2016, 12 (2) : 180 - 184
  • [8] Black box warnings in prescription drug labeling: Results of a survey of 206 drugs
    Beach, JE
    Faich, GA
    Bormel, FG
    Sasinowski, FJ
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 1998, 53 (03): : 403 - 411
  • [9] The Use of Social Media in Detecting Drug Safety-Related New Black Box Warnings, Labeling Changes, or Withdrawals: Scoping Review
    Lee, Jae-Young
    Lee, Yae-Seul
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Han Sol
    Yang, Bo Ram
    Kim, Myeong Gyu
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (06):