HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY COMMENTS TO US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGULATORY REFORM TASK FORCE

被引:4
|
作者
Ring, Joseph [1 ]
Tupin, Edward [1 ]
Elder, Deirdre [1 ]
Hiatt, Jerry [1 ]
Sheetz, Michael [1 ]
Kirner, Nancy [1 ]
Little, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Kirstein B324,330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2018年 / 114卷 / 05期
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; Health Physics Society; public information; regulations;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0000000000000809
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Health Physics Society (HPS) provided comment to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on options to consider when developing an action plan for President Trump's Executive Order to evaluate regulations for repeal, replacement, or modification. The HPS recommended that the EPA reconsider their adherence to the linear no-threshold (LNT) model for radiation risk calculations and improve several documents by better addressing uncertainties in low-dose, low dose-rate (LDDR) radiation exposure environments. The authors point out that use of the LNT model near background levels cannot provide reliable risk projections, use of the LNT model and collective-dose calculations in some EPA documents is inconsistent with the recommendations of international organizations, and some EPA documents have not been exposed to the public comment rule-making process. To assist in establishing a better scientific basis for the risks of low dose rate and low dose radiation exposure, the EPA should continue to support the "Million Worker Study," led by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 510
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] US Environmental Protection Agency Update on the Radionuclide NESHAPs
    Walsh, J. P.
    Rustick, J. H.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2023, 125 (01): : 30 - 30
  • [22] US Environmental Protection Agency Update on Compliance Codes
    Littleton, B.
    Stuenkel, D.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2023, 125 (01): : 31 - 31
  • [23] Biopesticide Oversight and Registration at the US Environmental Protection Agency
    Leahy, John
    Mendelsohn, Mike
    Kough, John
    Jones, Russell
    Berckes, Nicole
    [J]. BIOPESTICIDES: STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES, 2014, 1172 : 3 - 18
  • [24] Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment
    Doull, J
    [J]. HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 25 (01) : 44 - 45
  • [25] US Environmental Protection Agency's activities to prepare for regulatory and risk assessment applications of genomics information
    Benson, William H.
    Gallagher, Kathryn
    McClintock, J. Thomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2007, 48 (05) : 359 - 362
  • [27] REGULATORY CONCERNS OF THE UNITED-STATES-ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-AGENCY
    FENNERCRISP, P
    [J]. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1992, 20 (03) : 523 - 525
  • [28] Health implications of the West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency US Supreme Court decision
    Kizer, Kenneth W.
    Perera, Frederica P.
    Nadeau, Kari C.
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2022, 6 (11): : E847 - E848
  • [29] TASK-FORCE ON HEALTH REFORM - THE URBAN PERSPECTIVE
    MCGARVEY, MR
    BARONDESS, JA
    BRICKNER, PM
    BROWN, LD
    CHERKASKY, M
    CHRISTMAS, JJ
    CHU, BK
    DAVIS, K
    DECOSSE, J
    EDWARDS, AL
    FARBER, SJ
    HAMBURG, MA
    JONES, F
    KOTELCHUCK, R
    LEIMAN, JM
    LYNNE, D
    MATCH, RK
    MORRIS, TQ
    RAPHAEL, C
    RASKE, KE
    RAUTENBERG, E
    RODRIGUEZ, R
    SCHERR, L
    SHENSON, D
    SULLIVAN, J
    TALLON, JR
    FISHER, HM
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 1994, 71 (02) : 142 - 154
  • [30] US Environmental Protection Agency Policy: From the beginning to the millennium
    Bohannon, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (04) : 781 - 783