Performance comparison of renewable incentive schemes using optimal control

被引:17
|
作者
Oak, Neeraj [1 ]
Lawson, Daniel [2 ]
Charnpneys, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Ctr Complex Sci, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Math, Bristol BS8 1TW, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Engn Math, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Subsidy; Renewable energy; Incentive schemes; Feed-in tariff; Contract for difference; Renewable obligations; LEARNING-CURVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.038
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Many governments worldwide have instituted incentive schemes for renewable electricity producers in order to meet carbon emissions targets. These schemes aim to boost investment and hence growth in renewable energy industries. This paper examines four such schemes: premium feed-in tariffs, fixed feed-in tariffs, feed-in tariffs with contract for difference and the renewable obligations scheme. A generalised mathematical model of industry growth is presented and fitted with data from the UK onshore wind industry. The model responds to subsidy from each of the four incentive schemes. A utility or 'fitness' function that maximises installed capacity at some fixed time in the future while minimising total cost of subsidy is postulated. Using this function, the optimal strategy for provision and timing of subsidy for each scheme is calculated. Finally, a comparison of the performance of each scheme, given that they use their optimal control strategy, is presented. This model indicates that the premium feed-in tariff and renewable obligation scheme produce the joint best results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Competition for the biomass resource: Greenhouse impacts and implications for renewable energy incentive schemes
    Cowie, Annette L.
    Gardner, W. David
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (09): : 601 - 607
  • [12] Performance comparison and incentive contracts
    Hamamura, Jumpei
    Ohashi, Eiji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 47
  • [13] Performance Comparison of Medium Access Control Schemes for IEEE 802.11
    Kabir, Amran
    Alam, Mahjabeen
    Ahmed, Lubna
    Sabah, Sanjida
    Ferdous, Hasan Shahid
    [J]. 18TH ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (APCC 2012): GREEN AND SMART COMMUNICATIONS FOR IT INNOVATION, 2012, : 652 - 657
  • [14] Performance comparison of control schemes for ABR service in ATM LANs
    Wang, L
    McCrosky, C
    [J]. MASCOTS '97 - FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND SIMULATION OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 205 - 212
  • [15] High-performance optimal incentive-seeking in transactive control for traffic congestion
    Ochoa, Daniel E.
    Poveda, Jorge I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2022, 68
  • [16] Optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy systems using quasi-optimal control
    Ali, M. Montaz
    Mohammed, Nouralden
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 226
  • [17] Dynamic incentive mechanism on performance comparison
    Liu, B
    Yan, SW
    [J]. '99 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 492 - 496
  • [18] A Model of Incentive Wages as an Optimal Control Problem
    Aleksandrova, E. A.
    Anikin, S. A.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SOUTH URAL STATE UNIVERSITY SERIES-MATHEMATICAL MODELLING PROGRAMMING & COMPUTER SOFTWARE, 2014, 7 (04): : 22 - 35
  • [19] Incentive schemes and reciprocal production environments: the effect in team performance
    Moreno, Ignacio
    Sanchez-Exposito, Maria J.
    Vazquez, Francisco J.
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING-REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FINANCIACION Y CONTABILIDAD, 2014, 43 (04): : 404 - 423
  • [20] Optimal control of renewable energy in buildings using the machine learning method
    Wang, Lirong
    Zhang, Guodao
    Yin, Xuesong
    Zhang, Hongkai
    Ghalandari, Mohammad
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 53