Performance comparison of renewable incentive schemes using optimal control

被引:17
|
作者
Oak, Neeraj [1 ]
Lawson, Daniel [2 ]
Charnpneys, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Ctr Complex Sci, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Math, Bristol BS8 1TW, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Engn Math, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Subsidy; Renewable energy; Incentive schemes; Feed-in tariff; Contract for difference; Renewable obligations; LEARNING-CURVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.038
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Many governments worldwide have instituted incentive schemes for renewable electricity producers in order to meet carbon emissions targets. These schemes aim to boost investment and hence growth in renewable energy industries. This paper examines four such schemes: premium feed-in tariffs, fixed feed-in tariffs, feed-in tariffs with contract for difference and the renewable obligations scheme. A generalised mathematical model of industry growth is presented and fitted with data from the UK onshore wind industry. The model responds to subsidy from each of the four incentive schemes. A utility or 'fitness' function that maximises installed capacity at some fixed time in the future while minimising total cost of subsidy is postulated. Using this function, the optimal strategy for provision and timing of subsidy for each scheme is calculated. Finally, a comparison of the performance of each scheme, given that they use their optimal control strategy, is presented. This model indicates that the premium feed-in tariff and renewable obligation scheme produce the joint best results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPTIMAL INCENTIVE SCHEMES WITH MANY AGENTS
    MOOKHERJEE, D
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1984, 51 (03): : 433 - 446
  • [2] Optimal Incentive Schemes for Altruistic Providers
    Makris, Miltiadis
    Siciliani, Luigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMIC THEORY, 2013, 15 (05) : 675 - 699
  • [3] OPTIMAL INCENTIVE SCHEMES - EXISTENCE AND CHARACTERIZATION
    CLARKE, FH
    DARROUGH, MN
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1980, 5 (04) : 305 - 310
  • [4] A comparison of optimal iterative learning control schemes
    Rzewuski, M
    Rogers, E
    Owens, DH
    [J]. ADAPTATION AND LEARNING IN CONTROL AND SIGNAL PROCESSING 2001, 2002, : 77 - 82
  • [5] Optimal Control of DC Pension Plan Management under Two Incentive Schemes
    He, Lin
    Liang, Zongxia
    Liu, Yang
    Ma, Ming
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2019, 23 (01) : 120 - 141
  • [6] Performance Comparison of NCS using different State Feedback Control Schemes
    Garg, Janit
    Swarup, Akhilesh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (ICCS), 2019, : 770 - 775
  • [7] PERFORMANCE OF MULTIPERIOD MANAGERIAL INCENTIVE SCHEMES
    MURRELL, P
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1979, 69 (05): : 934 - 940
  • [8] Contract design and performance of railway maintenance: Effects of incentive intensity and performance incentive schemes
    Odolinski, Kristofer
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 18 : 50 - 59
  • [9] Optimal Incentive Design for Targeted Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources
    Das, Indrajit
    Bhattacharya, Kankar
    Canizares, Claudio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 5 (04) : 1213 - 1225
  • [10] OPTIMAL INCENTIVE SCHEMES IN BOTTLENECK-CONSTRAINED PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS
    DATAR, SM
    RAJAN, MV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (01) : 33 - 57