What technology enabled services impact business models in the automotive industry? An exploratory study

被引:39
|
作者
Athanasopoulou, Alexia [1 ]
de Reuver, Mark [1 ]
Nikou, Shahrokh [2 ]
Bouwman, Harry [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Jafalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Fanriksgatan 3 B, Turku, Finland
关键词
Business models; Automotive industry; Mobility-as-a-service; Technology innovations; Q-methodology; ELECTRIC CARS; Q-METHODOLOGY; INNOVATION; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The automotive industry is experiencing a phase of rapid innovation, with emergent technologies underpinning the realisation of self-driving cars, increased use of data and data analytics, sensors to enable car components to connect to the Internet-of-Things and the use of alternative energy sources, such as electric vehicles. Such innovations enable novel services, which in turn require actors within the automotive industry to change their business models. In this paper, we aim to identify novel automotive services that impact business models within the automotive industry. We use Q-methodology to explore and analyse the opinions of researchers and experts from the automotive industry. We find that four groups of services are expected to impact the business models in the automotive industry most: (1) personalised services, (2) generic mobility services; (3) shared mobility, and (4) connected cars. These are services at the level of the end-user, while more fundamental technology-based innovations, such as electrical driving, autonomous driving and Internet-of-Things applications, are scattered over different groups of end-user services. From these results, current business models can be analysed, and possible roadmaps for business model innovation can be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 83
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Structuring automotive product lines and feature models: an exploratory study at Opel
    Olesia Oliinyk
    Kai Petersen
    Manfred Schoelzke
    Martin Becker
    Soeren Schneickert
    Requirements Engineering, 2017, 22 : 105 - 135
  • [42] Services and the Business Models of Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the Software Industry
    Suarez, Fernando F.
    Cusumano, Michael A.
    Kahl, Steven J.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (02) : 420 - 435
  • [43] Predictive performance models in the South African Business Process Services industry
    Jacobs, Chris T. G.
    Roodt, Gerhard
    SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 45
  • [44] Structuring automotive product lines and feature models: an exploratory study at Opel
    Oliinyk, Olesia
    Petersen, Kai
    Schoelzke, Manfred
    Becker, Martin
    Schneickert, Soeren
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (01) : 105 - 135
  • [45] Recent business model and technology trends and their impact on the semiconductor industry
    Hu, Jackson
    2007 IEEE ASIAN SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2007, : 139 - 142
  • [46] New manufacturing technology implementation: a study of the Thai automotive industry
    Laosirihongthong, T
    Dangayach, GS
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2005, 16 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [47] Developing new business-to-business professional services: What factors impact performance?
    deBrentani, U
    Ragot, E
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1996, 25 (06) : 517 - 530
  • [48] An Exploratory Study on the Impact of the Construction Industry on Climate Change
    Elhegazy, Hosam
    Zhang, Jiansong
    Amoudi, Omar
    Zaki, Joliviana Nashaat
    Yahia, Mohamed
    Eid, Mohamed
    Mahdi, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT-INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2024, 09 (03): : 397 - 418
  • [49] An Exploratory Study of Social Purpose Business Models in the United States
    Cooney, Kate
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (01) : 185 - 196
  • [50] E-business services and business performance: a study of the telecommunications manufacturing industry
    Yang, Ying
    Humphreys, Paul
    McIvor, Ronan
    Yang, Biao
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2010, 21 (05) : 496 - 507