Experimental Study on the Reaction of CCl3F and CH4 in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Nonequilibrium Plasma Reactor

被引:1
|
作者
Kundu, Sazal K. [1 ]
Kennedy, Eric M. [1 ]
Mackie, John C. [1 ]
Holdsworth, Clovia I. [2 ]
Molloy, Thomas S. [1 ]
Gaikwad, Vaibhav V. [1 ]
Dlugogorski, Bogdan Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Engn, Proc Safety & Environm Protect Res Grp, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Discipline Chem, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[3] Murdoch Univ, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
GAS-PHASE REACTION; INFRARED-SPECTRA; PRESSURE; DESTRUCTION; CFC-11; ARGON; IONIZATION; HFC-134A; METHANE; WASTE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04010
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The reaction of CCl3F (CFC-11) with CH4 (in an argon bath gas) in a dielectric barrier discharge nonequilibrium plasma was examined. Oxygen and nitrogen were excluded from the feed stream and the reactions resulted in the production of fluorine-containing polymers, as well as a range of gaseous products including H-2, HCl, HF, C2H3F, C2H3Cl, C2H2ClF, CHCl2F, CCl2F2, CH3Cl, CH2Cl2, CHCl3, and C2Cl4. The polymeric material synthesized during reaction is characterized as being non-cross-linked and random in nature, containing functional groups including CH3, CH2, CHCl, CHF, CF2, and CF3. The conversion level of CCl3F increased from 37% to 63% as the input energy density increased from 3 to 13 kJ L-1 (the applied voltage range was 14.1 to 15.2 kV, peakpeak). The electrical discharge was characterized and found to be a slight modification of filamentary discharge toward a diffuse discharge due to the presence of the relatively low concentration of CCl3F and CH4 (less than 2% each) in argon. A reaction mechanism is proposed describing the formation of gas phase, as well as polymeric products.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 471
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Experimental study for momentum transfer in a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator
    Abe, Takashi
    Takizawa, Yuji
    Sato, Shunichi
    Kimura, Nobara
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (09) : 2248 - 2256
  • [42] Comparative Plasma Chemical Reaction Studies of CH4/Ar and C2Hm/Ar (m=2, 4, 6) Gas Mixtures in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge
    Thejaswini, H. C.
    Peglow, S.
    Martens, U.
    Sushkov, V.
    Hippler, R.
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS, 2014, 54 (08) : 683 - 696
  • [43] Experimental activities in view of hydrogen- deuterium equilibrium reaction in dielectric barrier discharge reactor: Effects of plasma treatment parameters and reactor design
    Li, Jiamao
    Liu, Sheng
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Junyan
    Chen, Chao
    Xia, Xiulong
    Yue, Lei
    Gao, Jiao
    Hou, Jingwei
    Huang, Houwen
    Xiao, Chengjian
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 202
  • [44] RATE-CONSTANT FOR THE REACTION OF OH WITH CH3CCL2F (HCFC-141B) DETERMINED BY RELATIVE RATE MEASUREMENTS WITH CH4 AND CH3CCL3
    HUDER, K
    DEMORE, WB
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1993, 20 (15) : 1575 - 1577
  • [45] Influence of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Power on the Removal of CH4 and NO From Exhaust Emissions of LNG Engines
    Zhao, Zhengtao
    Lyu, Lin
    Xiang, Chuang
    Cai, Yunkai
    PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2024, 44 (05) : 1925 - 1949
  • [46] Conversion of CH4 and CO2 to syngas and higher hydrocarbons using dielectric barrier discharge
    Hwang, BB
    Yeo, YK
    Na, BK
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 20 (04) : 631 - 634
  • [47] Correlation between a-C:H film properties and Ar/CH4 dielectric barrier discharge
    Bratescu, MA
    Yoshizaki, Y
    Suda, Y
    Sakai, Y
    Sugawara, H
    Takai, O
    THIN SOLID FILMS, 2006, 506 : 145 - 149
  • [48] Conversion of CH4 and CO2 to syngas and higher hydrocarbons using dielectric barrier discharge
    Bae-Bok Hwang
    Yeong-Koo Yeo
    Byung-Ki Na
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, 20 : 631 - 634
  • [49] Analytical Approach to estimate and Predict the CO2 Reforming of CH4 in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge
    Duc Ba Nguyen
    Lee, Won Gyu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 203 (07) : 917 - 923