Comparison of the Roche cobas® 4800 and Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV tests for primary cervical cancer screening in the HPV FOCAL trial

被引:35
|
作者
Cook, Darrel A. [1 ,2 ]
Mei, Wendy [3 ]
Smith, Laurie W. [1 ]
van Niekerk, Dirk J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ceballos, Kathy [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Franco, Eduardo L. [5 ]
Coldman, Andrew J. [1 ,4 ]
Ogilvie, Gina S. [2 ,4 ]
Krajden, Mel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] BC Ctr Dis Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
[3] Lower Mainland Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cervical cancer screening tests; Human papillomavirus DNA tests; Papanicolaou test; Colposcopy triage; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; WOMEN; CYTOLOGY; RISK; PREVENTION; PERFORMANCE; CLEARANCE; PRECANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1959-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: HPV FOCAL is a randomized trial (ISRCTN79347302, registered 20 Apr 2007) comparing high-risk (hr) HPV testing vs. liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25-65. We compared the Digene Hybrid Capture (R) 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test (R) (HC2) and the Roche cobas (R) 4800 HPV Test (COBAS) for primary screening. Methods: Women (n = 6,172) were screened at baseline by HC2 and COBAS and by LBC 24 months later. We assessed HPV genotyping and reflex LBC for colposcopy triage of baseline HPV positive women. Results: Overall HC2/COBAS agreement was 96.1 % (kappa 0.75) and positive agreement was 77.5 %. Baseline CIN2 and CIN3+ rates based on HPV screening were 8.6/ 1,000 and 6.6/1,000 respectively; 24 month rates were 0.7/1,000 and 0.4/1,000 (LBC screening). HC2 and COBAS were concordant positive for 91 % of round 1 CIN2 and 98 % of CIN3+. CIN3+ was significantly associated with HPV 16 (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.11; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.30, 11.37), but not HPV 18 (OR 2.62; 95 % CI 0.73, 9.49), vs. non-HPV 16/18 HPV at baseline. There was no significant association between HPV genotype and CIN2. CIN3+ was significantly more likely for high-grade (OR 5.99; 95 % CI 2.53, 14.18), but not low-grade (OR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.20, 1.49), vs. negative LBC. No significant association was observed between LBC grade and CIN2. HPV 16 and 18 were associated with 33 % of CIN2 and 68 % of CIN3+ identified at baseline. Conclusions: For hrHPV positive women, abnormal reflex LBC is appropriate for colposcopy triage. In addition, immediate referral of women with HPV 16/18 and normal cytology may allow for earlier detection of CIN2+ lesions which would not be detected until after follow-up testing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analytical Comparison of the cobas HPV Test with Hybrid Capture 2 for the Detection of High-Risk HPV Genotypes
    Mateos Lindemann, Maria Luisa
    Rodriguez Dominguez, Mario Jose
    Chacon de Antonio, Jesus
    Sandri, Maria Teresa
    Tricca, Alessio
    Sideri, Mario
    Khiri, Hacene
    Ravet, Sophie
    Boyle, Sean
    Aldrich, Carrie
    Halfon, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 14 (01): : 65 - 70
  • [42] A Comparison of the Roche Cobas HPV Test With the Hybrid Capture 2 Test for the Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes
    Levi, Angelique W.
    Bernstein, Jane I.
    Hui, Pei
    Duch, Kara
    Schofield, Kevin
    Chhieng, David C.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [43] Cervical Cytology Specimen Stability in Surepath Preservative and Analytical Sensitivity for HPV Testing with the cobas and Hybrid Capture 2 Tests
    Tardif, Keith D.
    Pyne, Michael T.
    Malmberg, Elisabeth
    Lunt, Tatum C.
    Schlaberg, Robert
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [44] HPV detection tests in cervical cancer screening
    Ruelle, Yannick
    Fiquet, Laure
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2016, 27 (123): : 24 - 33
  • [45] Comparison of CerviHPV and Hybrid Capture 2 HPV tests for detection of high-risk HPV infection in cervical swab specimens
    Zhao, Guodong
    Tian, Yaping
    Du, Yingying
    Sun, Jinli
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Ma, Yong
    Zheng, Minxue
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (05) : 439 - 444
  • [46] Comparison of cycle threshold values of the Cobas HPV test and viral loads of the BMRT HPV test in cervical cancer screening
    Yang, Qing
    Du, Hui
    Qu, Xinfeng
    Dai, Wenkui
    Gui, Liming
    Li, Changzhong
    Wang, Chun
    Guo, Chunlei
    Zhang, Yi
    Wei, Lihui
    Belinson, J. L.
    Wu, Ruifang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [47] hrHPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening. First round results From the HPV for CervicAL screening (HPV FOCAL) trial
    van Niekerk, D.
    Ogilvie, G.
    Krajden, M.
    Martin, R.
    Stuart, G.
    Ceballos, K.
    Peacock, S.
    Ehlen, T.
    Smith, L.
    Franco, E.
    Coldman, A.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 61 : 57 - 57
  • [48] Comparison of clinical performances among Roche Cobas HPV, RFMP HPV PapilloTyper and Hybrid Capture 2 assays for detection of high-risk types of human papillomavirus
    Yu, Shinae
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Lee, Eun Hee
    Park, Hyosoon
    Woo, Hee-Yeon
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2015, 87 (09) : 1587 - 1593
  • [49] A Head-to-Head Analytical Comparison of Cobas 4800 HPV, PapilloCheck HPV Screening, and LMNX Genotyping Kit HPV GP for Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cervical and Cervicovaginal Swabs
    Jaworek, Hana
    Koudelakova, Vladimira
    Drabek, Jiri
    Vrbkova, Jana
    Zborilova, Blazena
    Oborna, Ivana
    Brezinova, Jana
    Marek, Radim
    Huml, Karel
    Vanek, Peter
    Hajduch, Marian
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (06): : 849 - 858
  • [50] The prevalence of HPV in a screening population of 2965 women aged 30-65 years in Southern Jutland and Fyn. Comparison of the Cobas HPV Assay, Roche and the Hybrid Capture 2 Test, Qiagen
    Ornskov, Dorthe
    Waldstrom, Marianne
    APMIS, 2014, 122 : 5 - 5