Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester

被引:215
|
作者
Bouallagui, H
Ben Cheikh, R
Marouani, L
Hamdi, M
机构
[1] Ctr Urbain Nord, INSAT, Tunis 1080, Tunisia
[2] CITET, Tunis 1080, Tunisia
[3] ENIT, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
fruit and vegetable waste; anaerobic digestion; tubular digester; biogas;
D O I
10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00097-4
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A semi-continuously mixed mesophilic tubular anaerobic digester was tested for the conversion of fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) into biogas. The effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and the feed concentration on the extent of the degradation of the waste was examined. Varying the HRT between 12 and 20 days had no effect on the fermentation stability and pH remained between 6.8 and 7.6, but an inhibition of methanogenic bacteria was observed at HRT below 12 days. The overall performance of the reactor was depressed by changing the feed concentration from 8% to 10% TS (dry weight). By applying a feed concentration of 6% and HRT of 20 days in the tubular digester, 75% conversion efficiency of FVW into biogas with a methane content of 64% was achieved. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 89
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of the Feasibility of Converting the Liquid Fraction Separated from Fruit and Vegetable Waste in a UASB Digester
    Tanguay-Rioux, Fabrice
    Spreutels, Laurent
    Roy, Caroline
    Frigon, Jean-Claude
    [J]. BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [22] Biogas Production from Vegetable Waste by using Dog and Cattle Manure
    Phetyim, Natacha
    Wanthong, Tawanna
    Kannika, Phijittra
    Supngam, Anuwat
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2015, 79 : 436 - 441
  • [23] Biogas and digestate production from food waste: a case study of dome digester in Morocco
    Hassan Erraji
    Mohamed Elamin Afilal
    Abdeslam Asehraou
    Khalid Azim
    [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 10771 - 10780
  • [24] Biogas and digestate production from food waste: a case study of dome digester in Morocco
    Erraji, Hassan
    Afilal, Mohamed Elamin
    Asehraou, Abdeslam
    Azim, Khalid
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (12) : 10771 - 10780
  • [25] Characterizing Bacterial Consortia from an Anaerobic Digester Treating Organic Waste for Biogas Production
    Liaquat, Rabia
    Jamal, Asif
    Tauseef, Isfahan
    Qureshi, Zahid
    Farooq, Uzma
    Imran, Muhammad
    Ali, Muhammad Ishtiaq
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2017, 26 (02): : 709 - 716
  • [26] EFFICIENCY OF THE INNOVATIVE USE OF WASTE FROM FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION
    Bugaychuk, Vita
    Grabchuk, Inna
    Tymchak, Vira
    Orlykovskyi, Mykola
    [J]. MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 41 (02): : 183 - 196
  • [27] Effect of inoculums type and optimization of inoculum to substrate ratio on the kinetics of biogas production of fruit and vegetable waste
    Agrawal, Akanksha
    Chaudhari, Parmesh Kumar
    Ghosh, Prabir
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [28] Variations in generation of vegetable, fruit and flower market waste and effects on biogas production, exergy and energy contents
    V. Mozhiarasi
    C. J. Speier
    P. M. Benish Rose
    M. M. Mondal
    S. Pragadeesh
    D. Weichgrebe
    S. V. Srinivasan
    [J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2019, 21 : 713 - 728
  • [29] Variations in generation of vegetable, fruit and flower market waste and effects on biogas production, exergy and energy contents
    Mozhiarasi, V
    Speier, C. J.
    Rose, P. M. Benish
    Mondal, M. M.
    Pragadeesh, S.
    Weichgrebe, D.
    Srinivasan, S., V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 21 (03) : 713 - 728
  • [30] Effect of Mixing and Agitator Type on Biogas Production from Food Waste in a Pilot Plant Digester
    Karne, Hemlata
    Bhatkhande, Dhananjay
    [J]. WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2022, 13 (04) : 1885 - 1895