Quantification of solid waste management system efficiency using input-output indices

被引:23
|
作者
Bolingbroke, Damien [1 ]
Ng, Kelvin Tsun Wai [1 ]
Vu, Hoang Lan [1 ]
Richter, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Environm Syst Engn, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 3737 Wascana Pkwy, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Efficient waste management system; Municipal solid waste; Diversion efficiency; Cost-effectiveness; Diversion size indicator; Materials handled efficiency indicators; COST EFFICIENCY; LANDFILL SITES; COLLECTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10163-021-01187-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The assessment of solid waste management systems is vital for continued improvement in the efficiency of waste management systems (WMSs). Many studies have aimed to develop metrics that examine policy and system effectiveness, but there appears to be a lack of simple and comparable metrics to evaluate the WMS efficiency. This study introduces a set of novel waste diversion indicators, including a jurisdictionally comparable index known as diversion size indicator (DSI), and employs them to analyze WMSs in Canada. DSI increased in only a single province Nova Scotia during the 14-year study period. The DSI variability was largest for all Prairie Provinces, indicating that large efficiency changes in these province's WMSs over the study period. Combining all proposed metrics into a single rank showed that Saskatchewan outperformed all other Canadian jurisdictions, balancing diversion rate goals well with cost efficiency. Findings indicate that Alberta and Ontario rank very low in diversion efficiency and tonnage hauled efficiency. Also, Nova Scotia, the DSI leader, ranks lowest in terms of costs per tonne handled. Data availability remains a large barrier to a complete evaluation of WMSs. Nonetheless, the proposed original metrics create a framework for creating comparable and easy to use metrics for waste management efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1025
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL AND REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT
    HARTMAN, LM
    JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1965, 47 (05): : 1583 - 1591
  • [42] Water resources management in Beijing using economic input-output modeling
    Wang, L
    MacLean, HL
    Adams, BJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (04) : 753 - 764
  • [43] The Input and Output Management of Solid Waste using DEA models: A case study at Jengka, Pahang
    Mohamed, Siti Rosiah
    Ghazali, Nur Fadzrina Mohd
    Mohd, Ainun Hafizah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (SKSM24): MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES EXPLORATION FOR THE UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION, 2017, 1870
  • [44] Study on DEA efficiency of provincial input-output in China
    Zhang, R
    Li, ZR
    Tian, JX
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (12TH), VOLS 1- 3, 2005, : 1389 - 1392
  • [45] DEA Analysis of Input-Output Efficiency of Forestry in China
    Yu Jianglong
    Liu Junchang
    Xu Danyun
    2012 WORLD AUTOMATION CONGRESS (WAC), 2012,
  • [46] A Review on Higher Education Input-output Efficiency Study
    Fu Rong
    Liu Liming
    Huang Jian
    2011 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2011), VOL V, 2011, : 78 - 81
  • [47] Research of Universities' Input-Output Efficiency Basing on DEA
    Li Li
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, BUSINESS AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY (ICIBET 2013), 2013, 26 : 1180 - 1183
  • [48] Energy efficiency in general equilibrium with input-output linkages
    Blackburn, Christopher J.
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 110
  • [49] The analysis on efficiency of input-output of science and technology using improved DEA model
    Zhang, ZS
    Chen, GH
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2002, : 1864 - 1867
  • [50] Using a group support system to aid input-output identification in DEA
    Casu, B
    Shaw, D
    Thanassoulis, E
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (12) : 1363 - 1372