Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars Decline to Review their Peers' Work

被引：35

作者：

Breuning, Marijke ^{[1
]}

Backstrom, Jeremy ^{[2
]}

Brannon, Jeremy ^{[1
]}

Gross, Benjamin Isaak ^{[1
]}

Widmeier, Michael ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ N Texas, Denton, TX 76203 USA

[2] Natl Consortium, START, Buffalo, NY USA

来源：

PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS | 2015年 / 48卷 / 04期

关键词：

POLITICAL-SCIENCE; GENDER; GAP;

D O I：

10.1017/S1049096515000827

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

As new academic journals have emerged in political science and existing journals experience increasing submission rates, editors are concerned that scholars experience "reviewer fatigue." Editors often assume that an overload of requests to review makes scholars less willing to perform the anonymous yet time-consuming tasks associated with reviewing manuscripts. To date, there has not been a systematic investigation of the reasons why scholars decline to review. We empirically investigated the rate at which scholars accept or decline to review, as well as the reasons they gave for declining. We found that reviewer fatigue is only one of several reasons why scholars decline to review. The evidence suggests that scholars are willing to review but that they also lead busy professional and personal lives.

引用

页码：595 / 600

页数：6

共 50 条

[21] His opportunity, her burden: A narrative critical review of why women decline academic opportunities
Monteiro, Sandra
Chan, Teresa M.
Kahlke, Renate
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 57 (10) : 958 - 970
[22] Concepts of Mental Demands at Work That Protect Against Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Systematic Review
Hussenoeder, Felix S.
Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.
Conrad, Ines
Rodriguez, Francisca S.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2019, 33 (08) : 1200 - 1208
[23] WHY DOUBLE STANDARD - CRITICAL REVIEW OF RUSSIAN WORK ON HAZARDS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION
INGLIS, LP
IEEE ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY SYMPOSIUM RECORD, 1970, (12): : 168 - &
[24] Why Do Children Become Rejected by Their Peers? A Review of Studies into the Relationship Between Oral Communicative Competence and Sociometric Status in Childhood
Femke van der Wilt
Chiel van der Veen
Claudia van Kruistum
Bert van Oers
Educational Psychology Review, 2019, 31 : 699 - 724
[25] Why Do Children Become Rejected by Their Peers? A Review of Studies into the Relationship Between Oral Communicative Competence and Sociometric Status in Childhood
van der Wilt, Femke
van der Veen, Chiel
van Kruistum, Claudia
van Oers, Bert
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 31 (03) : 699 - 724
[26] Paying people who use illicit substances or ?peers? participating in community-based work: a narrative review of the literature
Greer, Alissa Merielle
Pauly, Bernadette
Scott, Alex
Martin, Ruth
Burmeister, Charlene
Buxton, Jane
DRUGS-EDUCATION PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2019, 26 (06) : 447 - 459
[27] NINETEENTH CENTURY MISSIONARY-SCHOLARS AT WORK A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS OF THE DAODEJING BY JOHN CHALMERS AND JAMES LEGGE
Kong, Wong Man
MONUMENTA SERICA-JOURNAL OF ORIENTAL STUDIES, 2015, 63 (01): : 124 - 149
[28] Does EMDR work? And if so, why?: A critical review of controlled outcome and dismantling research
Cahill, SP
Carrigan, MH
Frueh, BC
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1999, 13 (1-2) : 5 - 33
[29] Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini
Serge P. J. M. Horbach
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8
[30] Unpacking the 'why' behind strategic emotion expression at work: A narrative review and proposed taxonomy
Geddes, Deanna
Lindebaum, Dirk
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (05) : 708 - 722

← 1 2 3 4 5 →