PRE-EMERGENCE WEED CHEMICAL CONTROL IN HUSK TOMATO

被引:0
|
作者
Perez-Moreno, Luis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Castaneda-Cabrera, Cecilio [4 ,5 ]
Ramos-Tapia, Mario [4 ,5 ]
Antonio Tafoya-Razo, Jose [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] CINVESTAV, IPN Irapuato, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Guanajuato UGto, Guanajuato, Mexico
[4] UGto, Guanajuato 36500, Mexico
[5] Gowan Mexicana SAPI CV, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
[6] Univ Autonoma Chapingo UACH, Texcoco, Mexico
[7] UACH, Texcoco, Mexico
关键词
Control de Maleza; Fitotoxicidad; Herbicidas; Physalis ixocarpa Brot; Solanaceas; RIMSULFURON; POTATO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the phytotoxic effect of several pre-emergence herbicides on husk tomato and their weed control ability in Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico. The experiment was carried out from March to June 2008. The herbicide treatments were pendimethalin, flufenacet, bensulide, linuron, rimsulfuron, trifluralin, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and prometryn, at rates of 1650, 900, 5760, 1000, 50, 1500, 52.5, 240 and 480 gia/ha, respectively. Two control treatments, a weedy one (untreated) and a hand-weeded one, were included in the experiment. A randomized block design with four replications was used to set up the experiment, and its statistical analysis was carried out. The means were separated by using the Tukey test P <= 0.05. The results indicate that the most abundant weeds were barnyard grass (Echinochloa cruss-galli (L) P. Beauv.), curly dock (Rumex crispus L.) and jungle rice grass (E. colonum (L.) Link). Bensulide, rimsulfuron and trifluralin had the lowest levels of phytotoxicity to the crop, with 3.2, 7.5 and 7.5%, respectively. In contrast, pendimethalin, prometryn and flufenacet caused the greatest damage to the husk tomato crop, with 90.75, 43.75 and 31.25%, respectively. Rimsulfuron and linuron depicted the best weed control; with 98 and 70%.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 427
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sweet Corn Tolerance and Weed Control of S-metolachlor Applied Pre-emergence Followed by Various Post-emergence Herbicides
    Dittmar, Peter J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, VOL 125, 2012, 125 : 207 - 208
  • [42] Efficacy of Pre-emergence Herbicides in Controlling Rhynchosia capitata, An Emerging Summer Weed in Pakistan
    Ali, Hafiz Haider
    Tanveer, Asif
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Jamil, Moazzam
    Iqbal, Muhammad
    Javaid, Muhammad Mansoor
    Kashif, Muhammad Saleem
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2015, 98 (03): : 301 - 311
  • [43] Pre-emergence herbicides, not carrier volume, impacted weed management in conventional tillage systems
    Striegel, Sarah
    DeWerff, Ryan P.
    Arneson, Nicholas J.
    Oliveira, Maxwel C.
    Werle, Rodrigo
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [44] POTENTIAL CONTROL OF GERANIUM MOLLE IN OILSEED RAPE, PRE-EMERGENCE
    WHITE, GP
    RICHARDSON, WG
    ORSON, JH
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1984, 104 : 72 - 73
  • [45] Control of Ipomoea hederifolia and Ipomoea quamoclit with saflufenacil in pre-emergence
    Neves Campos, Henrique Borges
    Leal Soares, Ariane Morgana
    Decaro Junior, Sergio Tadeu
    Costa, Lilian Lucia
    Ferreira, Marcelo da Costa
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [46] WEEDS CONTROL WITH HERBICIDES APPLIED IN PRE-EMERGENCE IN POTATO CULTIVATION
    Fonseca, Luciano Ferreira
    Queiroz Luz, Jose Magno
    Duarte, Ivaniele Nahas
    Wangen, Dalcimar Batista
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 34 (02): : 279 - 286
  • [47] Pre-emergence Oxygenation and Postoperative Atelectasis
    Domino, Karen B.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (04) : 771 - 773
  • [48] COTTON YIELD AND WEED DENSITY AND DIVERSITY IN RESPONSE TO PRE-EMERGENCE APPLICATION OF HERBICIDES IN COTTON FIELD
    ANWARULHAQ
    SHAUKAT, SS
    AFZAL, M
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1981, 13 (01) : 77 - 86
  • [50] PRE-EMERGENCE CONTROL OF WEEDS IN CORN WITH 2,4-D
    ANDERSON, JC
    WOLF, DE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRONOMY, 1948, 40 (05): : 453 - 458