Quantification of gasoline-ethanol blend emissions effects

被引:5
|
作者
Clark, Nigel N. [1 ]
McKain, David L., Jr. [1 ]
Klein, Tammy [1 ]
Higgins, Terence S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Future Fuel Strategies, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] THiggins Energy, Southport, NC USA
关键词
DIRECT-INJECTION GDI; AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS; PARTICULATE-EMISSIONS; VAPOR-PRESSURES; PM EMISSIONS; ISO-BUTANOL; VEHICLES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/10962247.2020.1754964
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emissions levels from current gasoline spark-ignited engines are low, and emissions changes associated with the blending of ethanol into gasoline are small and difficult to quantify. Addition of ethanol, with a high blending octane number, allows a reduction in aromatics in market gasoline. Blending behavior of ethanol is nonlinear, altering the distillation curve, including the 50% temperature point, T50. Increase in gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine technology in the fleet challenges ability of older models based on port fuel injection (PFI) results to predict the overall air quality impact of ethanol blending. Five different models derived from data collected through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Energy Policy Act (EPAct) programs were used to predict LA92 Phase 1 particulate matter (PM) emissions for summer regular (SR) E0 (gasoline with 0% ethanol by volume), E10 (gasoline with 10% ethanol) and E15 (gasoline with 15% ethanol). Substantial reductions of PM for E10 and E15 relative to E0 were predicted when aromatics were displaced by ethanol to maintain octane rating. SR E0 and E10 were also matched to linear combinations of EPAct fuels and results showed a 35% PM reduction for SR E10 relative to SR E0. For GDI vehicles the Coordinating Research Council (CRC) E-94-3 study found that E10 had 23% or 29% PM increase. However, CRC E-129 found an E10 PM reduction of 10% when one E0 fuel and its splash blended (SB) E10 were compared. Both CRC project E-129 SB data and fuel triplets selected from the EPAct study showed variation for E15 emissions, although E-129 suggests that E15 in GDI offers about a 25% reduction of PM with respect to E0. Overall, data suggest that ethanol blending offers a modest to a substantial reduction of cold-start PM mass if aromatic levels of the finished products are reduced in response to ethanol addition. Implications: Studies of exhaust emissions effects of ethanol blending with gasoline vary in conclusions. Blending properties are nonlinear. Modeling of real-world emissions effects must consider all fuel composition adjustments and property changes associated with ethanol addition. Aromatics are reduced in E10 or E15, compared with E0, and distillation changes. PFI-derived models show reductions in cold-start PM for expected average E10 versus E0 pump fuel, due to reduced aromatic content. Relative emissions effects from older technology (PFI) engines do not predict newer engine (GDI) results reliably, but recent GDI data show reduced cold-start PM when ethanol displaces aromatics.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3 / 22
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of BTEX in Experimental Columns Containing Neat Gasoline and Gasoline-Ethanol
    Filho, Iraja N.
    Vieceli, Nathalia C.
    Cardoso, Eduardo M.
    Lovatel, Eduardo R.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 24 (03) : 410 - 417
  • [22] SVM and ANFIS for prediction of performance and exhaust emissions of a SI engine with gasoline-ethanol blended fuels
    Najafi, G.
    Ghobadian, B.
    Moosavian, A.
    Yusaf, T.
    Mamat, R.
    Kettner, M.
    Azmi, W. H.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 95 : 186 - 203
  • [23] A comprehensive experimental study on nucleate boiling in gasoline and gasoline-ethanol blends
    da Silva Oliveira, Arthur Vieira
    Mayer Alegre, Guilherme Henrique
    dos Santos, Rogerio Goncalves
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2017, 88 : 134 - 144
  • [24] The Genotoxicity of Organic Extracts from Particulate Emissions Produced by Neat Gasoline (E0) and a Gasoline-Ethanol Blend (E15) in BEAS-2B Cells
    Libalova, Helena
    Zavodna, Tana
    Elzeinova, Fatima
    Barosova, Hana
    Cervena, Tereza
    Milcova, Alena
    Vankova, Jolana
    Paradeisi, Foteini
    Vojtisek-Lom, Michal
    Sikorova, Jitka
    Topinka, Jan
    Rossner, Pavel
    JOURNAL OF XENOBIOTICS, 2024, 14 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [25] Gasoline-ethanol blend formulation to mimic laminar flame speed and auto-ignition quality in automotive engines
    Del Pecchia, M.
    Pessina, V.
    Berni, F.
    d'Adamo, A.
    Fontanesi, S.
    FUEL, 2020, 264 (264)
  • [26] Stratified Cold Start Sprays of Gasoline-Ethanol Blends
    Hemdal, Stina
    Denbratt, Ingemar
    Dahlander, Petter
    Warnberg, Jonas
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, 2009, 2 (01) : 683 - 696
  • [27] Ethanol Blend Effects On Direct Injection Spark-Ignition Gasoline Vehicle Particulate Matter Emissions
    Storey, John M.
    Barone, Teresa
    Norman, Kevin
    Lewis, Samuel
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, 2010, 3 (02) : 650 - 659
  • [28] PREDICTION OF PROPERTIES OF GASOLINE-ETHANOL BLENDS BY INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
    Sanchez-Minero, Felipe
    Ramirez-Jimenez, Edgar
    Silva-Oliver, Guadalupe
    Hernandez-Castillejos, Berenice
    AVANCES EN CIENCIAS E INGENIERIA, 2013, 4 (02): : 23 - 30
  • [29] Hot Surface Ignition of Gasoline-Ethanol Fuel Mixtures
    Ebersole, E.
    Matusz, Linda C.
    Modi, Manoj S.
    Orlando, Ronald E.
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2009, 2 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [30] Exhaust gas treatment for reducing cold start emissions of a motorcycle engine fuelled with gasoline-ethanol blends
    Raja, A. Samuel
    Arasu, A. Valan
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2015, 26 (02) : 84 - 93