Quantification of gasoline-ethanol blend emissions effects

被引:5
|
作者
Clark, Nigel N. [1 ]
McKain, David L., Jr. [1 ]
Klein, Tammy [1 ]
Higgins, Terence S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Future Fuel Strategies, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] THiggins Energy, Southport, NC USA
关键词
DIRECT-INJECTION GDI; AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS; PARTICULATE-EMISSIONS; VAPOR-PRESSURES; PM EMISSIONS; ISO-BUTANOL; VEHICLES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/10962247.2020.1754964
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emissions levels from current gasoline spark-ignited engines are low, and emissions changes associated with the blending of ethanol into gasoline are small and difficult to quantify. Addition of ethanol, with a high blending octane number, allows a reduction in aromatics in market gasoline. Blending behavior of ethanol is nonlinear, altering the distillation curve, including the 50% temperature point, T50. Increase in gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine technology in the fleet challenges ability of older models based on port fuel injection (PFI) results to predict the overall air quality impact of ethanol blending. Five different models derived from data collected through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Energy Policy Act (EPAct) programs were used to predict LA92 Phase 1 particulate matter (PM) emissions for summer regular (SR) E0 (gasoline with 0% ethanol by volume), E10 (gasoline with 10% ethanol) and E15 (gasoline with 15% ethanol). Substantial reductions of PM for E10 and E15 relative to E0 were predicted when aromatics were displaced by ethanol to maintain octane rating. SR E0 and E10 were also matched to linear combinations of EPAct fuels and results showed a 35% PM reduction for SR E10 relative to SR E0. For GDI vehicles the Coordinating Research Council (CRC) E-94-3 study found that E10 had 23% or 29% PM increase. However, CRC E-129 found an E10 PM reduction of 10% when one E0 fuel and its splash blended (SB) E10 were compared. Both CRC project E-129 SB data and fuel triplets selected from the EPAct study showed variation for E15 emissions, although E-129 suggests that E15 in GDI offers about a 25% reduction of PM with respect to E0. Overall, data suggest that ethanol blending offers a modest to a substantial reduction of cold-start PM mass if aromatic levels of the finished products are reduced in response to ethanol addition. Implications: Studies of exhaust emissions effects of ethanol blending with gasoline vary in conclusions. Blending properties are nonlinear. Modeling of real-world emissions effects must consider all fuel composition adjustments and property changes associated with ethanol addition. Aromatics are reduced in E10 or E15, compared with E0, and distillation changes. PFI-derived models show reductions in cold-start PM for expected average E10 versus E0 pump fuel, due to reduced aromatic content. Relative emissions effects from older technology (PFI) engines do not predict newer engine (GDI) results reliably, but recent GDI data show reduced cold-start PM when ethanol displaces aromatics.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 22
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions
    Costa, Rodrigo C.
    Sodre, Jose R.
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 (02) : 287 - 293
  • [2] Aging effects on gasoline-ethanol blend properties and composition
    Streva, Ernane Ribeiro
    Duarte Pasa, Vanya Marcia
    Sodre, Jose Ricardo
    [J]. FUEL, 2011, 90 (01) : 215 - 219
  • [3] Effects of fuel composition and octane sensitivity on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and soot emissions of gasoline-ethanol blend surrogates
    Kalvakala, Krishna C.
    Pal, Pinaki
    Aggarwal, Suresh K.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2020, 221 : 476 - 486
  • [4] Effects of Gasoline-Ethanol Dual-Fuel Injection on Engine Emissions
    Zhuang Y.
    Chang J.
    Qian L.
    Qian Y.
    [J]. Neiranji Xuebao/Transactions of CSICE (Chinese Society for Internal Combustion Engines), 2021, 39 (02): : 114 - 122
  • [5] Comparison of the combustion characteristics of gasoline and gasoline-ethanol blend under gasoline compression ignition mode
    Van Thanh Ngo
    Truong Giang Nguyen
    [J]. COGENT ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [6] Numerical Study of PAHs and Soot Emissions from Gasoline-Methanol, Gasoline-Ethanol, and Gasoline-n-Butanol Blend Surrogates
    Kalvakala, Krishna C.
    Pal, Pinaki
    Kukkadapu, Goutham
    McNenly, Matthew
    Aggarwal, Suresh
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2022, 36 (13) : 7052 - 7064
  • [7] Effect of the valve timing and the coolant temperature on particulate emissions from a gasoline direct-injection engine fuelled with gasoline and with a gasoline-ethanol blend
    Chen, Longfei
    Stone, Richard
    Richardson, Dave
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2012, 226 (D10) : 1419 - 1430
  • [8] Ethanol Clusters in Gasoline-Ethanol Blends
    Turanov, Alexander
    Khitrin, Anatoly K.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (37) : 9952 - 9955
  • [9] A reduced mechanism for the combustion of gasoline-ethanol blend on advanced engine combustion modes
    Zhang, Lei
    Qi, Qianhui
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 300
  • [10] A Comparison of Performance, Emissions, and Lube Oil Deterioration for Gasoline-Ethanol Fuel
    Ahmed, Wajahat
    Usman, Muhammad
    Shah, Muhammad Haris
    Abbas, Muhammad Mujtaba
    Saleem, Muhammad Wajid
    Abul Kalam, Muhammad
    Mahmoud, Omar
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (05)