Comparison of haemocompatibility improvement of four polymeric biomaterials by two heparinization techniques

被引:55
|
作者
Michanetzis, GPA [1 ]
Katsala, N [1 ]
Missirlis, YF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Biomed Engn Lab, Dept Mech Engn & Aeronaut, GR-26500 Patras, Greece
关键词
heparinization; covalent binding; haemocompatibility; atomic force microscopy; scanning electron microscopy;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00382-4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Two surface heparinization procedures, introduced by Bamford and Al-Lamee (Polymer 22 (1996) 4885; 13 (1994) 2844) and Seifert et al. (J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 7 (1996) 465), respectively, were applied to four commercially available biomaterials (silicone rubber, polyethylene, polypropylene and polyvinylchloride) in order to compare their efficiency in improving haemocompatibility. The indirect method (Bamford and Al-Lamee) produced a much better heparinization yield-10.5%,, maximum, compared to the direct one (Seifert et al.), of only 0.20% maximum. Both methods provided a better response of the heparinized biomaterials compared to the uncoated ones in terms of platelet retention and a significantly better response in terms of activation of the coagulation system, suggesting that heparin molecules remained biologically functional in both cases. The results were particularly interesting in the case of polyvinylchloride where the maximum immobilization yield was obtained by the indirect method resulting also to a pronounced haeoocompatibility improvement. Scanning electron microscopy studies confirmed adhered platelet morphology whereas atonmic force microscopy was used to examine surface morphology of heparinized and reference materials surface. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 688
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison and discussion of four techniques in the description of deposits
    Martinez, Angeles Raymund
    Vargas, Flores Mario
    Revista del Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo, 1988, 20 (04): : 13 - 28
  • [22] A comparison of four different endovenous ablation techniques
    Korkmaz, Kemal
    Yener, Ali Umit
    Genc, Serhat Bahadir
    Gedik, Hikmet Selcuk
    Budak, Ali Baran
    Cagli, Kerim
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 25 (02): : 209 - 215
  • [23] Comparison of Two Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Li, FengNing
    Li, ZhongHai
    Huang, Xuan
    Chen, Zhi
    Zhang, Fan
    Shen, HongXing
    Kang, Yifan
    Zhang, YinQuan
    Cai, Bin
    Hou, TieSheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [24] A Comparison of Four IMRT Quality Assurance Techniques
    McKissick, M.
    Duggan, D.
    Gaiser, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [25] A comparison of four visibility acceleration techniques for radiosity
    Ng, A
    VISUAL COMPUTER, 1996, 12 (06): : 307 - 316
  • [26] OCTALIS benchmarking: Comparison of four watermarking techniques
    Piron, L
    Arnold, M
    Kutter, M
    Funk, W
    Boucqueau, JM
    Craven, F
    SECURITY AND WATERMARKING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS, 1999, 3657 : 240 - 250
  • [27] Comparison of four different digital watermarking techniques
    Song, YJ
    Tan, TN
    2000 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I-III, 2000, : 946 - 950
  • [28] A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Alatas, C
    Mercan, R
    Mumcu, A
    Isiklar, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (05) : 1239 - 1243
  • [29] Comparison of four different binocular balancing techniques
    Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
    Goss, David A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2014, 97 (05) : 422 - 425
  • [30] Comparison of four Salmonella isolation techniques in four different inoculated matrices
    Rybolt, ML
    Wills, RW
    Byrd, JA
    Doler, TP
    Bailey, RH
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (07) : 1112 - 1116