Prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:7
|
作者
Sharobeem, Sam [1 ]
Boulmier, Dominique [1 ]
Leurent, Guillaume [1 ]
Bedossa, Marc [1 ]
Leclercq, Christophe [1 ]
Mabo, Philippe [1 ]
Martins, Raphael P. [1 ]
Tomasi, Jacques [2 ]
Verhoye, Jean-Philippe [2 ]
Donal, Erwan [1 ]
Sost, Gwenaelle [3 ]
Le Guellec, Marielle [1 ]
Le Breton, Herve [1 ]
Auffret, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, CHU Rennes, Serv Cardiol, Inserm LTSI U1099, Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, CHU Rennes, Serv Chirurg Cardiaque, Inserm LTSI U1099, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes 1, Serv Geriatr, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
关键词
Aortic stenosis; TAVR; Conduction disturbances; Permanent pacemaker implantation; Heart failure; CONDUCTION DISTURBANCES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; DISEASE; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; COLLEGE; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remain a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of PPI after TAVR according to the timing of implantation relative to TAVR. METHODS A total of 1199 patients (median age 83 years; interquartile range 78-86 years; 549 [45.8%] female) were included in the analysis, of whom 894 (70.8%) had not undergone PPI, 130 (10.8%) had undergone previous PPI, 116 (9.7%) had undergone in-hospital PPI, and 59 (4.9%) had undergone PPI during followup. Median follow-up was 2.94 years (1.42-4.32 years). The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher occurrence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.20) whereas previous PPI and in-hospital PPI were not (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.71-1.29 and HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.88-1.81, respectively). PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure (sub-HR 3.21; 95% CI 2.02-5.11), while this relationship was only borderline significant for previous PPI (sub-HR 1.51; 95% CI 0.99-2.29). In contrast, there was no relationship between in-hospital PPI and the subsequent risk of hospitalization for heart failure. CONCLUSION Previous PPI and in-hospital PPI had no long-term prognostic impact on the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure, whereas PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure. The present study questions the deleterious influence of periprocedural post-TAVR PPI, which has previously been suggested by certain studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1132
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors of conduction recovery after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Phan, Derek Q.
    Goitia, Jesse
    Lee, Ming-Sum
    Gupta, Nigel
    Aharonian, Vicken
    Mansukhani, Prakash
    Moore, Naing
    Brar, Somjot S.
    Zadegan, Ray
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 61 (02) : 365 - 374
  • [42] Imaging-based predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Routh, Jared M.
    Joseph, Lee
    Marthaler, Brodie R.
    Bhave, Prashant D.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (01): : 81 - 86
  • [43] Validation of scoring system predicting permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Shivamurthy, Poojita
    Vejpongsa, Pimprapa
    Gurung, Sidhanta
    Jacob, Robin
    Zhao, Yelin
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Balan, Prakash
    Nguyen, Tom C.
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    Dougherty, Anne H.
    Smalling, Richard W.
    Dhoble, Abhijeet
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (05): : 479 - 485
  • [44] Permanent pacemaker implantation after sutureless aortic valve replacement
    Verdugo-Marchese, Mario
    Dulguerov, Filip
    Nowacka, Anna
    Gunga, Ziyad
    Monney, Pierre
    Hugelshofer, Sarah
    Kirsch, Matthias
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 104S - 104S
  • [45] Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement
    Talwar, Sachin
    Choudhary, Shiv Kumar
    Kumar, Arkalgud Sampath
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 86 (04): : 1403 - 1403
  • [46] Reevaluation of the Indications for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Thygesen, Julie Bjerre
    Poay Huan Loh
    Cholteesupachai, Jiranut
    Franzen, Olaf
    Sondergaard, Lars
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 26 (02): : 94 - 99
  • [47] Prognostic impact of percentage of ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Dias Ferreira Reis, J. P.
    Mendonca, T.
    Castelo, A.
    Rodrigues, I.
    Fiarresga, A.
    Ramos, R.
    Cacela, D.
    Oliveira, M.
    Cruz Ferreira, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 612 - 612
  • [48] Prognostic Impact of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Among Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Buellesfeld, Lutz
    Strotecky, Stefan
    Hausen, Sven
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Meier, Bernhard
    Gerckens, Ulrich
    Grube, Eberhard
    Windecker, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (20) : B203 - B203
  • [49] Novel predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Nwaedozie, Somto
    Zhang, Haibin
    Mojarrab, Javad Najjar
    Sharma, Param
    Yeung, Paul
    Umukoro, Peter
    Soodi, Deepa
    Gabor, Rachel
    Anderson, Kelley
    Garcia-Montilla, Romel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 15 (11): : 582 - 598
  • [50] Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Nadar, Sunil Kumar
    Al-Rawahi, Mohammad
    Al-Riyami, Adil
    Al-Lawati, Hatim
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S33 - S34