Environmental assessment and management of Phosphogypsum according to European and United States of America regulations

被引:48
|
作者
Macias, Francisco [1 ]
Perez-Lopez, Rafael [1 ]
Canovas, Carlos R. [1 ]
Carrero, Sergio [1 ]
Cruz-Hernandez, Pablo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huelva, Dept Geol, Campus El Carmen, E-21071 Huelva, Spain
关键词
phosphogypsum; metals; enviromental regulation; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeps.2016.12.178
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Waste derived from fertilizer production has been accumulated worldwide for decades, especially during the last century. This waste is mainly formed by phosphogypsum; a mixture of gypsum along with phosphates, fluorides, and organic matter, which are generated from phosphoric acid production. Phosphogypsum deposits are usually associated with an important load of radionuclides and metals. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the hazard derived from the metals leaching with phosphogypsum deposits located in areas under US and European environmental regulations. Archived samples from Mulberry (USA) and field samples from Huelva (Spain) deposits have been characterized by leaching tests, as outlined in the aforementioned regulations. The obtained results have been collated with EN 12457-2 from the European regulation and TCLP from the US EPA. As a result, Mulberry phosphogypsum was classified as non-hazardous by both regulations. Since the regulations differ on their strictness, only the European regulation classifies the Huelva deposit as hazardous for As and Cd, urging to have monitoring measurements; while the US regulation classifies the deposit as non-hazardous, even though a pretreatment before depositing is recommended. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 669
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variation of United States environmental regulations on pesticide soil standard values
    Li, Zijian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2018, 25 (05): : 28 - 38
  • [22] MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN SUBSIDIARIES IN UNITED-STATES
    ROCOUR, JL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 1966, (01): : 13 - 27
  • [23] Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union and Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States
    Udo E. Simonis
    [J]. Environmentalist, 2004, 24 (3): : 199 - 201
  • [24] Public environmental law in the European Union and the United States
    Verschuuren, J
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2003, 40 (06): : 1551 - 1553
  • [25] Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Development in the United States
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    Ryu, Youngbok
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [26] Environmental assessment of United States dairy farms
    Rotz, Alan
    Stout, Robert
    Leytem, April
    Feyereisen, Gary
    Waldrip, Heidi
    Thoma, Greg
    Holly, Michael
    Bjorneberg, David
    Baker, John
    Vadas, Peter
    Kleinman, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 315
  • [27] Regulations and practices of recycling in NATO countries - B - Canada and United States of America
    Edgecombe, FHC
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF POLYMER RECYCLING, 1998, 351 : 29 - 39
  • [28] Immigrant America: European ethnicity in the United States - Walch,T
    McGreevy, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN ETHNIC HISTORY, 1996, 16 (01) : 98 - 98
  • [29] The United States of America Effect on Turkey - European Union Relations
    Kirac, Ziya Kivanc
    Kisman, Zulfukar Aytac
    Sofronie, Bogdan Andrei
    Orha, Norina Cristiana
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS QUERIES IN FINANCE AND BUSINESS (EMQ 2013), 2014, 15 : 1697 - 1703
  • [30] European migration to the United States of America 1783-1820
    Mustafa, SA
    [J]. AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2003, 108 (01): : 158 - 159