Transradial versus Transfemoral Approach in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome. A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:34
|
作者
Piccolo, Raffaele [1 ]
Galasso, Gennaro [1 ]
Capuano, Ernesto [1 ]
De Luca, Stefania [1 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Trimarco, Bruno [1 ]
Piscione, Federico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Salerno, Dept Med & Surg, I-84100 Salerno, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; FEMORAL APPROACH; BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS; RADIAL APPROACH; ACCESS; IMPACT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0096127
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Transfemoral approach (TFA) remains the most common vascular access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in many countries. However, in the last years several randomized trials compared transradial approach (TRA) with TFA in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but only few studies were powered to estimate rare events. The aim of the current study was to clarify whether TRA is superior to TFA approach in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis of safety and efficacy of TRA in ACS setting was performed. Methods and Results: Medline, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, scientific session abstracts and relevant websites were searched. Data concerning the study design, patient characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were extracted. The primary endpoint was death. Secondary endpoints were: major bleeding and vascular complications. Outcomes were assessed within 30 days. Eleven randomized trials involving 9,202 patients were included. Compared with TFA, TRA significantly reduced the risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.94; p = 0.016), but this finding was not confirmed in trial sequential analysis, indicating that sufficient evidence had not been yet reached. Furthermore, TRA compared with TFA reduced the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88; p = 0.008) and vascular complications (OR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.28-0.46; p<0.001); these findings were supported by trial sequential analyses. Conclusions: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, a lower risk of death was observed with TRA. Nevertheless, the association between mortality and TRA in ACS setting should be interpreted with caution because it is based on insufficient evidence. However, because of the clinical relevance associated with major bleeding and vascular complications reduction, TRA should be recommended as first-choice vascular access in patients with ACS undergoing cardiac catheterization.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TRANSRADIAL VERSUS TRANSFEMORAL INTERVENTION IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN ASIAN POPULATION
    Rha, Seung Woon
    Park, Ji Young
    Choi, Byoung Geol
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Oh, Dong Joo
    Cho, Byung Ryul
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Kim, Doo-Il
    Jeong, Myung-Ho
    Yoo, Sang Yong
    Jeong, Sang-Sik
    Kim, Byung Ok
    Hyun, Min Su
    Yoon, Junghan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1812 - E1812
  • [42] Intravenous β-blockers for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Elgendy, Akram Y.
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Mansoor, Hend
    Mojadidi, Mohammad K.
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 223 : 891 - 897
  • [43] Cangrelor for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Sardar, Partha
    Nairooz, Ramez
    Chatterjee, Saurav
    Mushiyev, Savi
    Pekler, Gerald
    Visco, Ferdinand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2014, 38 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [44] Cangrelor for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Partha Sardar
    Ramez Nairooz
    Saurav Chatterjee
    Savi Mushiyev
    Gerald Pekler
    Ferdinand Visco
    [J]. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2014, 38 : 1 - 10
  • [45] Transradial versus Transfemoral Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Asian Population
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Park, Ji Young
    Choi, Byoung Geol
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Oh, Dong Joo
    Cho, Byung Ryul
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Kim, Doo-Il
    Jeong, Myung-Ho
    Yoo, Sang Yong
    Jeong, Sang-Sik
    Kim, Byung Ok
    Hyun, Min Su
    Yoon, Junghan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (8A): : 120A - 120A
  • [46] Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Jingyuan
    Wang, Qian
    Wu, Chunliu
    Qu, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Lei
    He, Xiaofeng
    Ma, Sicong
    Qiu, Miaohan
    Wang, Xiaozeng
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 148 (04) : 363 - 373
  • [47] IMMEDIATE VERSUS DELAYED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH NON-ST SEGMENT ELEVATION-ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Rajpurohit, Naveen
    Garg, Nadish
    Choudhary, Abhishek
    Aggarwal, Kul B.
    Dellsperger, Kevin C.
    Alpert, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1173 - E1173
  • [48] Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Rajpurohit, Naveen
    Garg, Nadish
    Garg, Rajeev
    Choudhary, Abhishek
    Fresen, John
    Boren, Sue
    Dellsperger, Kevin C.
    Webel, Richard
    Aggarwal, Kul
    Alpert, Martin A.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 81 (02) : 223 - 231
  • [49] Head-to-head comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sakurai, Ryota
    Burazor, Ivana
    Bonneau, Heidi N.
    Kaneda, Hideaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (05) : 457 - 464
  • [50] Colchicine administration for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fu, Chenchao
    Wang, Bin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 46 : 121 - 125