Transradial versus Transfemoral Approach in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome. A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:34
|
作者
Piccolo, Raffaele [1 ]
Galasso, Gennaro [1 ]
Capuano, Ernesto [1 ]
De Luca, Stefania [1 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [1 ]
Trimarco, Bruno [1 ]
Piscione, Federico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Salerno, Dept Med & Surg, I-84100 Salerno, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; FEMORAL APPROACH; BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS; RADIAL APPROACH; ACCESS; IMPACT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; CATHETERIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0096127
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Transfemoral approach (TFA) remains the most common vascular access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in many countries. However, in the last years several randomized trials compared transradial approach (TRA) with TFA in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but only few studies were powered to estimate rare events. The aim of the current study was to clarify whether TRA is superior to TFA approach in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis of safety and efficacy of TRA in ACS setting was performed. Methods and Results: Medline, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, scientific session abstracts and relevant websites were searched. Data concerning the study design, patient characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes were extracted. The primary endpoint was death. Secondary endpoints were: major bleeding and vascular complications. Outcomes were assessed within 30 days. Eleven randomized trials involving 9,202 patients were included. Compared with TFA, TRA significantly reduced the risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.94; p = 0.016), but this finding was not confirmed in trial sequential analysis, indicating that sufficient evidence had not been yet reached. Furthermore, TRA compared with TFA reduced the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88; p = 0.008) and vascular complications (OR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.28-0.46; p<0.001); these findings were supported by trial sequential analyses. Conclusions: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, a lower risk of death was observed with TRA. Nevertheless, the association between mortality and TRA in ACS setting should be interpreted with caution because it is based on insufficient evidence. However, because of the clinical relevance associated with major bleeding and vascular complications reduction, TRA should be recommended as first-choice vascular access in patients with ACS undergoing cardiac catheterization.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radial versus femoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials
    Piccolo, R.
    Niglio, T.
    Di Gioia, G.
    D'Anna, C.
    De Rosa, R.
    Strisciuglio, T.
    Trimarco, B.
    Piscione, F.
    Galasso, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 15 - 15
  • [2] Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    张步春
    车文良
    刘伟静
    徐亚伟
    [J]. South China Journal of Cardiology, 2010, 11 (04) : 238 - 245
  • [3] Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rodriguez, Z.
    Valdecanas, A.
    Palileo, N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 1465 - 1465
  • [4] COMPARISON OF TRANSRADIAL VERSUS TRANSFEMORAL ACCESS FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN STEMI PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Jhand, Aravdeep
    Atti, Varunsiri
    Dhawan, Rahul
    Turagam, Mohit
    Mamas, A. Mamas
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Kumar, Arnav
    Katta, Natraj
    Chatzizisis, Yiannis S.
    Abbott, J.
    Kirtane, Ajay
    Bhatt, Deepak
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1281 - 1281
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Singh, Param P.
    Singh, Mukesh
    Khosla, Natalia
    Shah, Tejaskumar
    Molnar, Janos
    Arora, Rohit
    Khosla, Sandeep
    [J]. CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2012, 23 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [6] Immediate versus deferred percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Weijun
    He, Wenhua
    Zhou, Yuqing
    Guo, Yanfei
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [7] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B183 - B183
  • [8] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    George, Jon C.
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 26 : 39 - 45
  • [9] Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Rijal, Jharendra
    Lee, Juyong
    Korr, Kenneth S.
    Azrin, Michael
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (05) : 857 - 865
  • [10] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TRANSRADIAL VERSUS TRANSFEMORAL CORONARY INTERVENTION IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Singh, Param P.
    Bedi, Updesh S.
    Singh, Mukesh
    Adigopula, Sasikanth
    Kodumuri, Vamsi
    Bahekar, Amol
    Sethi, Ankur
    Molnar, Janos
    Arora, Rohit
    Khosla, Sandeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)