Clinical efficacy of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for painless delivery

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Xuehui [1 ]
He, Dan [2 ]
Liu, Yahong [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
Su, Honghui [3 ]
机构
[1] Hengyang Maternal & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Obstet, Hengyang, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hengyang Maternal & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Hengyang, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Pain, 138 Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia; painless delivery; clinical application; efficacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: This prospective study was designed to compare the effect of painless childbirth under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and normal delivery. Methods: We enrolled 86 parturients with full-term singleton pregnancies who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Hengyang Maternal and Child Health Care hospital from June 2018 to December 2019. Among them, 43 parturients with painless delivery were randomly selected into the CSEA group and 43 parturients with normal delivery were put into the non-CSEA group. After anesthesia in the CSEA group, the parturients of both groups at each stage of labor were clinically evaluated in terms of the analgesic efficiency, degree of motor block, delivery mode, labor duration, blood loss at 2 hours and 24 hours after delivery and Apgar scores of the newborns. Results: The analgesic efficiency was significantly higher, and the blood loss at 2 h and 24 h after delivery was much less in the CSEA group than in the non-CSEA group (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, the total length of labor revealed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); however, the duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shorter, while the duration of the second stage of labor was much more prolonged in the CSEA group than in the non-CSEA group (all P<0.05). Otherwise, no significant differences were identified in spontaneous delivery rates and Apgar scores between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusion: CSEA can exert an obvious analgesic effect, decrease the rate of cesarean section and assisted delivery, as well as reduce the length of the first stage of labor and postoperative bleeding in the process of delivery, thus greatly alleviating maternal pain and fetal distress and promoting the health of mothers and infants. As a result, the CSEA technique is worthy of promotion and application during delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:9984 / 9990
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy Between Remifentanil Self-Administration and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Multiparous Labor and Delivery
    Wang, Cong
    Yang, Yuan
    Wu, Gu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 19 (04) : 565 - 573
  • [33] Comparison of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
    Frigon, C
    Martin, R
    Chrétien, A
    Pilote, M
    Tétrault, JP
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (02): : U139 - U139
  • [34] Fractured Small Gauge Needle During Attempted Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
    Wendling, Adam L.
    Wendling, Matthew T.
    Gravenstein, Dietrich
    Euliano, Tammy Y.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (01): : 245 - 245
  • [35] Pre-emptive Analgesic and Haemodynamic Efficacy of Combined Spinal-Epidural Neostigmine Delivery
    Taspinar, Vildan
    Pala, Yasar
    Diker, Serap
    Ornek, H. Dilsen
    Ozdogan, Levent
    Akcay, Murat
    Dikmen, Bayazit
    Gogus, Nermin
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2012, 22 (04): : 201 - 206
  • [36] A Randomized Comparison of Low Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
    Leo, Serene
    Sng, Ban Leong
    Lim, Yvonne
    Sia, Alex T. H.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (05): : 1600 - 1605
  • [37] Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anesthesia versus single-shot spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery
    Choi, DH
    Ahn, HJ
    Kim, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 15 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [38] Comparison of general anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery
    Cakici, Mehmet C.
    Ozok, Hakki U.
    Erol, Demet
    Catalca, Sibel
    Sari, Sercan
    Ozdemir, Harun
    Selmi, Volkan
    Kartal, Ibrahim G.
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (06) : 636 - 643
  • [39] Efficacy of prophylactic epidural ketamine for reducing shivering in patients undergoing caesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
    Xue, Xing
    Lv, Ying
    Zhao, Youhong
    Leng, Yufang
    Zhang, Yan
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2018, 8 (05) : 485 - 490
  • [40] Spinal subdural hematoma and subdural anesthesia following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case report
    Bi, Yanmei
    Zhou, Junying
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)