Trade liberalization and Firms' export performance in China: Theory and evidence

被引:27
|
作者
Fan, Haichao [1 ,4 ]
Lai, Edwin L. -C. [2 ]
Qi, Han [3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Inst World Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Econ, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Inst Int Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Imported-input liberalization; Firms' export performance; Comparative advantage; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY; COMPETITION; GROWTH; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2019.05.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The focus of the literature surrounding trade liberalization has recently shifted from trade liberalization in imported final goods to studying the effects of trade liberalization in imported intermediate inputs. This emphasis fits very well the trade liberalization experience of China following its accession to the WTO in 2001. In this paper, we build a multi-sector heterogenous-firm model with trade in both intermediate goods and final goods, and we ask: How do final-goods producers respond to trade liberalization in imported inputs? Do they respond differently across sectors? How do firms respond differently to trade liberalization in imported-outputs instead? We separate the total effect of trade liberalization into those caused by inter-sectoral resource allocation (IRA) and by within-sector selection of firms according to productivity (which we call Melitz selection effect). It is the IRA effect that gives rise to differential impacts of trade liberalization in different sectors. These impacts include changes in the probability of entry into the export market, the fraction of firms that export and the share of export revenue. To test our hypotheses, we carry out both quantitative analysis and empirical analysis by using Chinese firm-level data. The results are consistent with our theoretical predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 668
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Lingduo
    Liu, Shuangshuang
    Zhang, Guofeng
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 88 (04) : 1401 - 1430
  • [12] Trade liberalization and export diversification
    Aditya, Anwesha
    Acharyya, Rajat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2015, 39 : 390 - 410
  • [13] Trade liberalization and heterogeneous firms' adjustments: evidence from India
    Bas, Maria
    Ledezma, Ivan
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2020, 156 (02) : 407 - 441
  • [14] Trade liberalization and heterogeneous firms’ adjustments: evidence from India
    Maria Bas
    Ivan Ledezma
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2020, 156 : 407 - 441
  • [15] Trade liberalization with granular firms
    Alfaro, Martin
    Warzynski, Frederic
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 105
  • [16] Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization
    Bernard, Andrew B.
    Redding, Stephen J.
    Schott, Peter K.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 126 (03): : 1271 - 1318
  • [17] Trade Liberalization with Heterogeneous Firms
    Baldwin, Richard E.
    Forslid, Rikard
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 14 (02) : 161 - 176
  • [18] The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China
    Chen, Chien-Hsun
    Mai, Chao-Cheng
    Yu, Hui-Chuan
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 17 (02) : 226 - 235
  • [19] Sustainability of Trade Liberalization and Antidumping: Evidence from Mexico's Trade Liberalization toward China
    Liu, Yi
    Zhang, Ning
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (09) : 11484 - 11503
  • [20] Does input trade liberalization boost downstream firms' exports? Theory and firm-level evidence
    Chevassus-Lozza, Emmanuelle
    Gaigne, Carl
    Le Mener, Leo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 90 (02) : 391 - 402