Trade liberalization and Firms' export performance in China: Theory and evidence

被引:27
|
作者
Fan, Haichao [1 ,4 ]
Lai, Edwin L. -C. [2 ]
Qi, Han [3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Inst World Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Econ, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Inst Int Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Imported-input liberalization; Firms' export performance; Comparative advantage; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY; COMPETITION; GROWTH; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2019.05.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The focus of the literature surrounding trade liberalization has recently shifted from trade liberalization in imported final goods to studying the effects of trade liberalization in imported intermediate inputs. This emphasis fits very well the trade liberalization experience of China following its accession to the WTO in 2001. In this paper, we build a multi-sector heterogenous-firm model with trade in both intermediate goods and final goods, and we ask: How do final-goods producers respond to trade liberalization in imported inputs? Do they respond differently across sectors? How do firms respond differently to trade liberalization in imported-outputs instead? We separate the total effect of trade liberalization into those caused by inter-sectoral resource allocation (IRA) and by within-sector selection of firms according to productivity (which we call Melitz selection effect). It is the IRA effect that gives rise to differential impacts of trade liberalization in different sectors. These impacts include changes in the probability of entry into the export market, the fraction of firms that export and the share of export revenue. To test our hypotheses, we carry out both quantitative analysis and empirical analysis by using Chinese firm-level data. The results are consistent with our theoretical predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 668
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Processing trade, export intensity, and input trade liberalization: evidence from Chinese firms
    Tian, Wei
    Yu, Miaojie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2015, 20 (03) : 444 - 464
  • [2] Export scope, managerial efficiency, and trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Qiu, Larry D.
    Yu, Miaojie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 177 : 71 - 90
  • [3] Input Trade Liberalization and the Export Duration of Products: Evidence from China
    Zhou, Dinggen
    Yang, Jingjing
    Lai, Mingyong
    [J]. CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2019, 27 (06) : 1 - 25
  • [4] Trade liberalization and export performance in Bolivia
    Jenkins, R
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1996, 27 (04) : 693 - 716
  • [5] Trade Liberalization and Export Performance: A Literature Review
    Gaglio, Cyrielle
    [J]. REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2017, 127 (01): : 25 - 46
  • [6] The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms
    Cui, Jingbo
    Tam, On Kit
    Wang, Bei
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (12): : 3357 - 3383
  • [7] Does services liberalization affect manufacturing firms' export performance? Evidence from India
    Bas, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 (03) : 569 - 589
  • [8] Capital market liberalization and firms' OFDI performance: Evidence from China
    Han, Weihui
    Han, Lv
    Yang, Qingqing
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 59
  • [9] Trade liberalization and volatility: Evidence from Indian firms
    Sundaram, Asha
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 27 (05) : 1409 - 1426
  • [10] The effects of trade intermediaries on firms' export market diversification: Evidence from China
    He, Canfei
    Jiang, Sheng
    Hu, Xuqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 32 (06): : 973 - 989