Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: A large, nationwide sample of deliveries

被引:29
|
作者
Ford, Abigail A. D.
Bateman, Brian T.
Simpson, Lynn L.
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
VBAC; twin gestation; uterine rupture;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.036
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the maternal morbidity associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in twin gestations using a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Study design: Data for this study were obtained from an administrative dataset, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a representative sample of discharges from non-Federal hospitals, for the years 1993 to 2002. Patients admitted nonemergently for the delivery of twin gestations who had a history of previous cesarean delivery were selected. Patients that either delivered vaginally or who had discharge codes that indicated labor before cesarean delivery were defined as the trial of labor group, while patients who had a cesarean delivery without discharge codes that indicated labor were defined as the elective cesarean group. Various complications of delivery were analyzed for each group. Results: We identified 4705 women who underwent art elective cesarean delivery and 1850 women who underwent a trial of labor. For women who had a trial of labor, 836 (45.2%) delivered vaginally. The rate of uterine rupture was higher in the trial of labor group than in the elective cesarean group (0.9% vs 0.1%, P < .001), and the rate of wound complications was lower (0.6% vs 1.3%, P < .02). The rates of other complications including hysterectomy, transfusion, major postpartum infection, thromboembolism, uterine dehiscence, and pelvic hematoma were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our study showed a significantly higher rate of uterine rupture in the trial of labor group that is similar to the rates reported for trial of labor after cesarean in singleton pregnancies. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1142
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent*
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Namath, Amalia G.
    Ali, Munira
    Naqvi, Mariam
    Gupta, Simi
    Rebarber, Andrei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (16): : 2638 - 2642
  • [32] Predictive factors of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Jerbi, M.
    Hidar, S.
    Ammar, A.
    Khairi, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 94 (01) : 43 - 44
  • [33] Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Namath, Amalia G.
    Ali, Munira
    Rebarber, Andrei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S348 - S348
  • [34] Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Cho, MK
    Kim, YH
    Song, TB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 86 (03) : 392 - 393
  • [35] Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery:: To induce or not to induce?
    Oláh, KS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) : 1109 - 1110
  • [36] Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery - current status
    Harer, WB
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (20): : 2627 - 2630
  • [37] Uterine Didelphys and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
    Altwerger, Gary
    Pritchard, Ashley M.
    Black, Jonathan D.
    Sfakianaki, Anna K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (01): : 157 - 159
  • [38] Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (04): : 679 - 680
  • [39] Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in twin pregnancies: Is it safe?
    Cahill, A
    Stamilio, D
    Pare, E
    Peipert, J
    Macones, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S183 - S183
  • [40] VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY: A TREND ANALYSIS
    Surbek, Daniel
    Schmid, Corina
    Scheibner, Katrin
    Kuhn, Annette
    Raio, Luigi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : S73 - S73