Accounting for Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review

被引:9
|
作者
Wright, Stuart J. [1 ]
Newman, William G. [2 ,3 ]
Payne, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Manchester Ctr Genom Med, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Ctr Genom Med, North West Genom Lab Hub, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; STAGE BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH-CARE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; TRASTUZUMAB THERAPY; HORMONE-RECEPTOR; BARRIERS; WOMEN; ASSAY; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-019-00801-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background and Objective Precision (stratified or personalised) medicine is underpinned by the premise that it is feasible to identify known heterogeneity using a specific test or algorithm in patient populations and to use this information to guide patient care to improve health and well-being. This study aimed to understand if, and how, previous economic evaluations of precision medicine had taken account of the impact of capacity constraints. Methods A meta-review was conducted of published systematic reviews of economic evaluations of precision medicine (test-treat interventions) and individual studies included in these reviews. Due to the volume of studies identified, a sample of papers published from 2007 to 2015 was collated. A narrative analysis identified whether potential capacity constraints were discussed qualitatively in the studies and, if relevant, which quantitative methods were used to account for capacity constraints. Results A total of 45 systematic reviews of economic evaluations of precision medicine were identified, from which 222 studies focusing on test-treat interventions, published between 2007 and 2015, were extracted. Of these studies, 33 (15%) qualitatively discussed the potential impact of capacity constraints, including budget constraints; quality of tests and the testing process; ease of use of tests in clinical practice; and decision uncertainty. Quantitative methods (nine studies) to account for capacity constraints included static methods such as capturing inefficiencies in trials or models and sensitivity analysis around model parameters; and dynamic methods, which allow the impact of capacity constraints on cost effectiveness to change over time. Conclusions Understanding the cost effectiveness of precision medicine is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for its successful implementation. There are currently few examples of evaluations that have quantified the impact of capacity constraints, which suggests an area of focus for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1027
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic evaluations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review
    Lidia García-Pérez
    Pilar Pinilla-Domínguez
    Antonio García-Quintana
    Eduardo Caballero-Dorta
    F. Javier García-García
    Renata Linertová
    Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2015, 16 : 879 - 893
  • [42] Systematic review of economic evaluations in pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus
    Woldetensaye, Anania G.
    Patel, Palak V.
    Koerner, Jagger C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2023, 27 (02): : 65 - 69
  • [43] Systematic review of economic evaluations for paediatric pulmonary diseases
    Chitando, Mutsawashe
    Cleary, Susan
    Cunnama, Lucy
    [J]. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [44] A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations
    Tompa, Emile
    de Oliveira, Claire
    Dolinschi, Roman
    Irvin, Emma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (01) : 16 - 26
  • [45] A systematic review of economic evaluations of treatments for patients with epilepsy
    Wijnen, Ben F. M.
    van Mastrigt, Ghislaine A. P. G.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    Gershuni, Olga
    Lambrechts, Danielle A. J. E.
    Majoie, Marian H. J. M.
    Postulart, Debby
    Aldenkamp, Bert A. P.
    de Kinderen, Reina J. A.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2017, 58 (05) : 706 - 726
  • [46] A systematic review of health economic evaluations in occupational therapy
    Green, Sally
    Lambert, Rod
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 80 (01) : 5 - 19
  • [47] Economic evaluations in community aged care: a systematic review
    Bulamu, Norma B.
    Kaambwa, Billingsley
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [48] Global economic evaluations of rotavirus vaccines: A systematic review
    Kotirum, Surachai
    Vutipongsatorn, Naaon
    Kongpakwattana, Khachen
    Hutubessy, Raymond
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    [J]. VACCINE, 2017, 35 (26) : 3364 - 3386
  • [49] Diagnostic Testing for Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations
    Rojas-Garcia, Paula
    van der Pol, Simon
    van Asselt, Antoinette D. I.
    Postma, Maarten J.
    Rodriguez-Ibeas, Roberto
    Juarez-Castello, Carmelo A.
    Gonzalez, Marino
    Antonanzas, Fernando
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [50] A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices
    Guan, Yushan
    Ru, Nan
    Kang, Ruifu
    Jia, Xiangping
    Xu, Tingting
    Meng, Zhaolin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 2024