Lessons from Ideation: Where Does User Involvement Lead Us?

被引:21
|
作者
Schweitzer, Fiona [1 ]
Gassmann, Oliver [2 ,3 ]
Rau, Christiane [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Ctr Innovat & Prod Management IPM, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ St Gallen, Inst Technol Management, St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Schindler Corp Corp Res, Ebikon, Switzerland
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS; INFORMATION; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE; VALIDATION; BEHAVIOR; SEEKING; FUTURE; DOMAIN;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12058
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Firms are increasingly involving users in new product development (NPD). Their product users frequently provide solution information, such as new product ideas. However, these users are often considered a homogeneous group of ordinary users; their individual abilities and the specific input they provide for NPD are not yet well understood. The goal of this paper is to determine whether different types of users are differently predisposed to produce ideas. We derive hypotheses regarding the possible outcome of involving different user types in idea generation tasks from the current literature on customer integration into NPD. In a quasi-experimental setting, we test our assumptions on 93 users, who generate ideas in a smart home context. The results indicate that users' contribution depends on their specific domain knowledge, which is broadly understood as knowledge of a specific area that influences ideation towards solutions in this domain. We distinguish between four types of users: those with high trend awareness, high technical skills, high technical innovativeness, and high ethical reflectiveness. We find that users with high technical skills are more likely to produce ideas that are technically feasible. Trend-aware and technically innovative users produce ideas of greater originality. Ethically reflective users tend to come up with ideas that will have a positive impact on society.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 167
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Where Will the Century of Biology Lead Us?
    Mayes, Randall
    FUTURIST, 2014, 48 (03) : 26 - 30
  • [22] Businesses lead where US falters
    Erica Gies
    Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7 : 543 - 546
  • [23] WHERE WILL TEACHER TESTING LEAD US
    PLATT, MC
    MUSIC EDUCATORS JOURNAL, 1986, 72 (09) : 28 - 30
  • [24] Where are WEEE now? Lessons from WEEE: Will EPR work for the US?
    Huisman, Jaco
    Magalini, Federico
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 149 - +
  • [25] Where Does (Co)evolution Lead to?
    Paredis, Jan
    ECAL 2015: THE THIRTEENTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2015, : 138 - 145
  • [26] WHERE DOES RANDOMNESS LEAD IN SPACETIME?
    Bailleul, Ismael
    Raugi, Albert
    ESAIM-PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2010, 14 : 16 - 52
  • [27] WHERE DOES THE CHURCH HISTORY LEAD TO?
    Jaspert, Bernd
    REVUE D HISTOIRE ECCLESIASTIQUE, 2019, 114 (3-4): : 828 - 834
  • [28] Religious naturalism - Where does it lead?
    Rue, Loyal
    ZYGON, 2007, 42 (02): : 409 - 422
  • [29] Radiosurgery: Where does the future lead?
    Backlund, EO
    RADIOSURGERY 1995, 1996, 1 : 11 - 16
  • [30] USER INVOLVEMENT - DOES IT EXIST, IS IT ENOUGH
    NEWMAN, M
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1984, 35 (05): : 34 - 38