Availability analysis of a permissioned blockchain with a lightweight consensus protocol

被引:12
|
作者
Altarawneh, Amani [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Fei [1 ]
Brooks, Richard R. [1 ]
Hambolu, Owulakemi [1 ]
Yu, Lu [1 ]
Skjellum, Anthony [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Clemson, SC USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Chattanooga, SimCtr, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee Chattanooga, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Blockchain; Digital ledger technology; Non-cryptocurrency; Secure provenance; Scrybe; Lightweight mining; Consensus protocols;
D O I
10.1016/j.cose.2020.102098
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper offers a novel approach to the evaluation of provenance blockchain security and reliability using analytical methods for assessing system availability against malicious miner DoS attacks. In particular, we present the reliability and availability analysis of the LightWeight Mining (LWM) protocol for securing data provenance. Our analysis shows the reliability of the protocol and its ability to protect against malicious miner DoS attacks. We use digital signatures to prove integrity and non-repudiation of messages passing the system. We describe system behaviors using communicating sequential processes (CSP) to check for synchronization within a number of concurrent processes. Queuing theory is used to determine the average waiting time for client blockchain transactions when malicious miners work to slow the system. CSP and queuing theory jointly test the blockchain's ability to make progress despite the presence of malicious miners. Further, the methodology described can be extended to other blockchain applications. Additional threats, beyond the malicious miner DoS attack, are reserved for future work. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Redactable Blockchain in the Permissioned Setting
    Peng, Chunying
    Xu, Haixia
    Liao, Huimei
    Tang, Jinling
    Tang, Tao
    SCIENCE OF CYBER SECURITY, SCISEC 2023, 2023, 14299 : 460 - 477
  • [42] Lightweight Blockchain Consensus Protocols for Vehicular Social Networks
    Zheng, Zehui
    Pan, Jianping
    Cai, Lin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (06) : 5736 - 5748
  • [43] A New Consensus Protocol for Blockchain Interoperability Architecture
    Pang, Yan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 153719 - 153730
  • [44] Concordia: A Streamlined Consensus Protocol for Blockchain Networks
    Santiago, Carlos
    Ren, Shuyang
    Lee, Choonhwa
    Ryu, Minsoo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 13173 - 13185
  • [45] Proof of Luck: an Efficient Blockchain Consensus Protocol
    Milutinovic, Mitar
    He, Warren
    Wu, Howard
    Kanwal, Maxinder
    SYSTEX 2016: 1ST WORKSHOP ON SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR TRUSTED EXECUTION, 2016,
  • [46] Modeling and Verifying the CKB Blockchain Consensus Protocol
    Sun, Meng
    Lu, Yuteng
    Feng, Yichun
    Zhang, Qi
    Liu, Shaoying
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (22)
  • [47] FireLedger: A High Throughput Blockchain Consensus Protocol
    Buchnik, Yehonatan
    Friedman, Roy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT, 2020, 13 (09): : 1525 - 1539
  • [48] Adapted PBFT Consensus Protocol for Sharded Blockchain
    Yang, Ling
    Huang, Huawei
    SCIENCE OF CYBER SECURITY, SCISEC 2022, 2022, 13580 : 36 - 50
  • [49] A Blockchain Consensus Protocol based on Fuzzy Signatures
    Santini, Paolo
    Rafaiani, Giulia
    Battaglioni, Massimo
    Chiaraluce, Franco
    Baldi, Marco
    IEEE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, GLOBECOM, 2023, : 886 - 891
  • [50] Attack Surface Analysis of Permissioned Blockchain Platforms for Smart Cities
    Davenport, Amanda
    Shetty, Sachin
    Liang, Xueping
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SMART CITIES CONFERENCE (ISC2), 2018,