Geotechnical design of suction caisson in clay

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, J [1 ]
Cao, JC [1 ]
Audibert, JME [1 ]
机构
[1] Fugro McClelland Marine Geosci Inc, Houston, TX USA
关键词
suction caisson design; uplift capacity; set-up factor; reverse end bearing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Suction caissons have proven to be economical and easy to install for anchoring deepwater offshore structures with taut or semi-taut moorings, such as FPSOs (Floating Production Storage Offloading), SPARs, FPSs (Floating Production Systems), etc. However, due to the complex loading conditions and paucity of model test database, the design of suction caissons is still in the state-of-the-art phase, and no industry consensus has been reached. Unlike traditional driven piles, suction caissons are different in many ways, such as the installation methods and load-resisting mechanisms. This paper systematically discusses the geotechnical design of suction caissons installed in clay stratigraphies. Many important aspects and factors involved in suction caisson design, such as set-up effects, soil failure modes, padeye location optimization, axial capacities estimation, cyclic loading and sustained load effects, etc. are brought up for discussion. Limit equilibrium methods are used as an effective way to estimate suction caisson capacity and caisson penetration/removal parameters as well. Beam-column and Finite Element Analyses are more advanced methods to better understand caisson load-displacement behavior and verify load capacity derived from the limit equilibrium methods. Finally, suggestions for future research are given on how to clarify the uncertainties associated with current suction caisson designs.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 779
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study on cyclic characteristics and equivalent cyclic creep model of the soft clay at the bottom of suction caisson foundation
    Zhu Wen-bo
    Dai Guo-liang
    Wang Bo-chen
    Gong Wei-ming
    Sun Jie
    Hu Hao
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2022, 43 (02) : 466 - 478
  • [42] Design considerations of suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines in Southern China
    Liu, Bo
    Zhang, Youhu
    Ma, Zhaorong
    Andersen, Knut H.
    Jostad, Hans Petter
    Liu, Donghua
    Pei, Aiguo
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2020, 104 (104)
  • [43] Uplift capacity prediction of suction caisson in clay using a hybrid intelligence method (GMDH-HS)
    Shahr-Babak, Mojtaba Masoumi
    Khanjani, Mohammad Javad
    Qaderi, Kourosh
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2016, 59 : 408 - 416
  • [44] Model tests on tilt adjustment techniques for a mooring dolphin platform with three suction caisson foundations in clay
    Zhang, Puyang
    Ding, Hongyan
    Le, Conghuan
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2013, 73 : 96 - 105
  • [45] Prediction of uplift capacity of suction caisson in clay using functional network and multivariate adaptive regression spline
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Murakonda, P.
    Das, S. Kumar
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2018, 25 (02) : 517 - 531
  • [46] Bearing capacity and soil deformation around modified suction caisson in clay under monotonic horizontal loading
    Zhang, Yukun
    Wang, Yansheng
    Li, Dayong
    Mao, Dawei
    MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 41 (09) : 959 - 968
  • [47] GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN OF VERTICALLY LOADED HYBRID SUCTION-GRAVITY ANCHORS
    Hesar, Majid
    Maciel, Raquel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2017, VOL 9, 2017,
  • [48] Numerical investigation and design of suction caisson for on-bottom pipelines under combined V-H-M-T loading in normal consolidated clay
    Liu, Tao
    Zhang, Yan
    Meng, Qingsheng
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 274
  • [49] Lateral undrained resistance of suction caisson anchors
    Aubeny, CP
    Murff, JD
    Moon, SK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING, 2001, 11 (03) : 211 - 219
  • [50] Serviceability of suction caisson founded offshore structures
    Cox, James A.
    Bhattacharya, Subhamoy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 170 (03) : 273 - 284