High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Motor Intracortical Neurophysiology: A Sham-Controlled Investigation

被引:6
|
作者
Malcolm, Matt P. [1 ,2 ]
Paxton, Roger J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Integrat Rehabil Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Brain; Neurostimulation; Intracortical facilitation; Intracortical inhibition; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; CORTEX EXCITABILITY; FUNCTION RECOVERY; SILENT PERIOD; STROKE; INHIBITION; MODULATION; RTMS; IMPROVEMENT; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1097/WNP.0000000000000203
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus sham stimulation on intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation within the motor cortex. Such data are needed to better understand the presumed neurophysiologic effects of rTMS.Methods:The authors hypothesized that, compared with sham stimulation, 20 Hz rTMS will decrease ICI and increase intracortical facilitation in healthy volunteers. Using single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS, the authors evaluated prestimulation and poststimulation effects on motor cortex neurophysiology in neurologically healthy volunteers who received 2,000 stimuli of either 20 Hz rTMS (n = 11) or sham rTMS (n = 8). Primary outcomes were changes in ICI and intracortical facilitation and secondary outcomes were changes in motor threshold and motor evoked potential amplitude, and both were assessed using separate 2 x 2 (group x time) repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results:For ICI, there were main effects of time (P = 0.002) and group (P < 0.001) with a significant group-by-time interaction (P < 0.01). Intracortical inhibition decreased after rTMS, but was unchanged by sham rTMS. Intracortical facilitation results revealed a main effect of group (P = 0.02) and a significant group-by-time interaction (P = 0.048). Intracortical facilitation increased after rTMS and was slightly reduced after sham rTMS. The group-by-time interactions for motor threshold and motor evoked potential amplitude were not significant.Conclusions:High-frequency rTMS significantly influences the excitatory and inhibitory outputs of motor intracortical networks, specifically increasing intracortical facilitation and reducing ICI as compared with sham stimulation. Such changes were observed despite no significant changes in broader measures of motor cortex activation, that is, motor threshold and motor evoked potential amplitude.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 433
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of right prefrontal cortex in bipolar mania: A randomized sham controlled study
    Praharaj, S. K.
    Ram, D.
    Arora, M.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2008, 10 : 90 - 90
  • [22] Safety and Behavioral Effects of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke
    Yozbatiran, Nuray
    Alonso-Alonso, Miguel
    See, Jill
    Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli
    Luu, Daniel
    Motiwala, Rehan R.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Cramer, Steven C.
    STROKE, 2009, 40 (01) : 309 - 312
  • [23] Cognitive effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review
    Guse, Birgit
    Falkai, Peter
    Wobrock, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2010, 117 (01) : 105 - 122
  • [24] Efficacy of High Frequency [10 Hz] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Tekin, Atilla
    Ozdil, Esra
    Guleken, Mehemet Diyaddin
    Iliser, Resat
    Bakim, Bahadir
    Oncu, Julide
    Cevik, Mehmet
    Kuran, Banu
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2014, 22 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [25] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Supplementary Motor Area in Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment: a Sham-Controlled Trial
    Pelissolo, Antoine
    Harika-Germaneau, Ghina
    Rachid, Fady
    Gaudeau-Bosma, Christian
    Tanguy, Marie-Laure
    BenAdhira, Rene
    Bouaziz, Noomane
    Popa, Traian
    Wassouf, Issa
    Saba, Ghassen
    Januel, Dominique
    Jaafari, Nematollah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 19 (08): : 1 - 6
  • [26] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Delirium: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Pilot Study
    Yaghoubi, Emad
    Shariat, Seyed Vahid
    Rashedi, Vahid
    Jolfaei, Atefeh Ghanbari
    BASIC AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 13 (02) : 237 - 246
  • [27] REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF TINNITUS: META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Geres, Natko
    Penic, Sandra Zecevic
    Sucic, Strahimir
    Gajsak, Tomislav
    Milovac, Zeljko
    Librenjak, Dina
    Gorsic, Helena
    Barun, Ivan
    Skopljak, Katarina
    Senjug, Lucija
    Pozgaj, Vladimir
    Orgulan, Ivana
    Ivkic, Goran
    Kosec, Andro
    Geber, Goran
    Grosic, Vladimir
    Flipcic, Ivona Simunovic
    Filipcic, Igor
    Bajic, Zarko
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2022, 34 : 54 - 55
  • [28] Interleaving Motor Sequence Training With High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Facilitates Consolidation
    Rumpf, Jost-Julian
    May, Luca
    Fricke, Christopher
    Classen, Joseph
    Hartwigsen, Gesa
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2020, 30 (03) : 1030 - 1039
  • [29] Transcranial direct current stimulation preconditioning modulates the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human motor cortex
    Cosentino, Giuseppe
    Fierro, Brigida
    Paladino, Piera
    Talamanca, Simona
    Vigneri, Simone
    Palermo, Antonio
    Giglia, Giuseppe
    Brighina, Filippo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 35 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [30] Modulatory effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the ipsilateral silent period
    Cincotta, M.
    Giovannelli, F.
    Borgheresi, A.
    Balestrieri, F.
    Zaccara, G.
    Inghilleri, M.
    Berardelli, A.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (04) : 490 - 496