The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with Mercedes incision

被引:14
|
作者
Guo, Jian-guo [1 ]
Li, Hui-ling [1 ]
Pei, Qing-qing [2 ]
Feng, Zhi-ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sch Med, 79 Qing Chun Rd, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] First Peoples Hosp Beilun Dist, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Postoperative pain; Transverses abdominis plane block; Liver resection; Ropivacaine; ROBOTIC-ASSISTED HYSTERECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; LIPOSOMAL BUPIVACAINE; LIVER RESECTION; SENSORY BLOCK; SURGERY; ROPIVACAINE; PAIN; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-018-0499-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Conventional perioperative analgesic modalities (e.g. opioids, epidural analgesia) have their own drawbacks, which limit their clinical application. This study investigated the opioid-sparing effectsof the oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) blockade with ropivacaine for the patients undergoing open liver resection with a Mercedes incision. Methods: 126 patients who were scheduled for open liver resection were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided OSTAPblocks with either 0.375% ropivacaine (groupT) or 0.9% isotonic saline (group C). Both groups also received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous 40 mg parecoxib every 12 h for a total of 3 days. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters, plus intraoperative and postoperative cumulative sufentanil consumption, were recorded. Results: 70 patients were enrolled in the study finally. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to preoperative parameters, and surgical and anesthetic characteristics. The intraoperative sufentanil use, cumulative sufentanil consumption at 5 min after extubation, 2 h, 4 h, 12 h and 24 h after operation in group T was significantly less than that in group C (P = 0.001, 0.001, 0.000, 0.000, 0.001 and 0.044, respectively). Compared with group C, postoperative NRS pain scores at rest were significantly lower at 2 h and 4 h postoperatively in group T (P = 0.04and 0.02, respectively); NRS scores at the time of coughing were also significantly lower in group T than in group C at all time points except 5 min after extubation (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with group C, the number of intraoperative vasodilator use, the extubation time and the incidence of nausea was reduced in group T. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided OSTAP block with ropivacaine can significantly decrease the perioperative cumulative dosage of analgesics and improve analgesic effect without obvious side effects for the patients who underwent an open liver resection with Mercedes incision when compared tothe ultrasound-guided OSTAP block with saline.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block can improve analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Vrsajkov, Vladimir
    Mancic, Nedjica
    Mihajlovic, Dunja
    Milicevic, Suzana Tonkovic
    Uvelin, Arsen
    Vrsajkov, Jelena Pantic
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (02): : 149 - 153
  • [42] Ultrasound-guided subcostal oblique transversus abdominis plane block in canine cadavers
    Drozdzynska, Maja
    Monticelli, Paolo
    Neilson, David
    Viscasillas, Jaime
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 44 (01) : 183 - 186
  • [43] Analgesic efficacy of a laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus no transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric gastric bypass surgery a retrospective analysis among 332 individuals
    De Santo, Gianluca
    Stumpf, Oliver
    Look, Peter
    Abdelmalek, Marc
    Lefering, Rolf
    Mantke, Rene
    Paasch, Christoph
    BMC SURGERY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [44] Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
    Shrey, Shruti
    Sinha, Chandni
    Kumar, Abhyuday
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Kumar, Amarjeet
    Nambiar, Sreehari
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (11) : 965 - 970
  • [45] Erratum to: The efficacy of continuous subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after living liver donation: a retrospective study
    Akihiko Maeda
    Sho Carl Shibata
    Hiroshi Wada
    Shigeru Marubashi
    Takahiko Kamibayashi
    Hidetoshi Eguchi
    Yuji Fujino
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2016, 30 : 546 - 546
  • [46] Magnesium Efficacy to Improve Analgesic Effects of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks
    Kendall, Mark C.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2018, 21 (01) : E84 - E84
  • [47] The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    McDonnell, John G.
    O'Donnell, Brian
    Curley, Gerard
    Heffernan, Anne
    Power, Camillus
    Laffey, John G.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (01): : 193 - 197
  • [48] Analgesic Efficacy of Preemptive Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Hong, Kwan Young
    Kim, Duk Kyung
    Park, Hue Jung
    Sim, Woo Seog
    Wi, Won Gook
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Jin Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [49] Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy
    Niraj, G.
    Searle, A.
    Mathews, M.
    Misra, V.
    Baban, M.
    Kiani, S.
    Wong, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (04) : 601 - 605
  • [50] A randomised controlled trial investigating the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for adult laparoscopic appendicectomy
    Tupper-Carey, Darell Alexander
    Fathil, Shahridan Mohd
    Tan, Yin Kiat Glenn
    Kan, Yuk Man
    Cheong, Chern Yuen
    Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid
    Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (08) : 481 - 487