Extractive Text Summarization Models for Urdu Language

In the recent few years, a lot of advancement has been made in Urdu linguistics. There are many portals and news websites that are generating a huge amount of data every day. However, there is still no publicly available dataset nor any framework available for automatic Urdu extractive summary generation. In an automatic extractive summary generation, the sentences with the highest weights are given importance to be included in the summary. The sentence weight is computed by the sum of the weights of the words in the sentence. There are two famous approaches to compute the weight of the words in the English language: local weights (LW) approach and global weights (GW) approach. The sensitivity of the weights depends on the contents of the text, the one word may have different weights in a different article, known as LW based approach. Whereas, in the case of GW, the weights of the words are computed from the independent dataset, which implies the weights of all words remain the same in different articles. In the proposed framework, LW and GW based approaches are modeled for the Urdu language. The sentence weight method and the weighted term-frequency method are LW based approaches that compute the weights of the sentences by the sum of important words and the sum of frequencies of the important words, respectively. Whereas, vector space model (VSM) is GW based approach, that computes the weight of the words from the independent dataset, and then remain the same for all types of the text; GW is widely used in the English language for various applications such as information retrieval and text classification. The extractive summaries are generated by LW and GW based approaches and evaluated with ground-truth summaries that are obtained by the experts. The VSM is used as a baseline framework for sentence weighting. Experiments show that LW based approaches are better for extractive summary generation. The F-score of the sentence weight method and the weighted term-frequency method are 80% and 76%, respectively. The VSM achieved only 62% accuracy on the same dataset. Both, the datasets with ground-truth, and the code are made publicly available for the researchers.