Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control

被引:42
|
作者
Nuthmann, Antje [1 ,2 ]
Engbert, Ralf [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Reading; Eye movements; Computational modeling; Mindless reading; E-Z-READER; SACCADE GENERATION; PERCEPTUAL-SPAN; MISLOCATED FIXATIONS; DYNAMICAL MODEL; LETTER STRINGS; WORDS; CONTROVERSIES; DURATIONS; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In this article, we revisit the mindless reading paradigm from the perspective of computational modeling. In the standard version of the paradigm, participants read sentences in both their normal version as well as the transformed (or mindless) version where each letter is replaced with a z. z-String scanning shares the oculomotor requirements with reading but none of the higher-level lexical and semantic processes. Here we use the z-string scanning task to validate the SWIFT model of saccade generation [Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813] as an example for an advanced theory of eye-movement control in reading. We test the central assumption of spatially distributed processing across an attentional gradient proposed by the SWIFT model. Key experimental results like prolonged average fixation durations in z-string scanning compared to normal reading and the existence of a string-length effect on fixation durations and probabilities were reproduced by the model, which lends support to the model's assumptions on visual processing. Moreover, simulation results for patterns of regressive saccades in z-string scanning confirm SWIFT's concept of activation field dynamics for the selection of saccade targets. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 336
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An eye-movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text
    Ariasi, N.
    Hyoenae, J.
    Kaakinen, J. K.
    Mason, L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2017, 33 (03) : 202 - 221
  • [32] MODEL OF THE CONTROL-SYSTEM OF THE INVOLUNTARY EYE-MOVEMENT
    GUSEV, VM
    PODVIGIN, NF
    BIOFIZIKA, 1986, 31 (02): : 309 - 312
  • [33] Modelling and control of eye-movement
    Barbu, D. M.
    Luculescu, M. C.
    Barbu, I
    Annals of DAAAM for 2003 & Proceedings of the 14th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2003, : 29 - 30
  • [34] INFERENCES ABOUT EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL FROM THE PERCEPTUAL SPAN IN READING
    POLLATSEK, A
    RAYNER, K
    BALOTA, DA
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 40 (02): : 123 - 130
  • [35] KINEMATICS OF EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL
    VANDENBERG, AV
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 260 (1358) : 191 - 197
  • [36] EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL AND NYSTAGMUS
    LUECK, CJ
    KENNARD, C
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 1 (05) : 476 - 483
  • [37] Development of eye-movement control
    Luna, Beatriz
    Velanova, Katerina
    Geier, Charles F.
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2008, 68 (03) : 293 - 308
  • [38] The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models
    Reichle, ED
    Rayner, K
    Pollatsek, A
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2003, 26 (04) : 445 - +
  • [39] Deep-learning-based reading eye-movement analysis for aiding biometric recognition
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Zhao, Xinbo
    Zhang, Yanning
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 444 : 390 - 398
  • [40] Do your eyes give you away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading
    Steindorf, Lena
    Rummel, Jan
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (01) : 162 - 176