Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis Follow-up Study to Skeletal Maturity

被引:90
|
作者
Tan, Ken-Jin [1 ]
Moe, Maung Maung [1 ]
Vaithinathan, Rose [2 ]
Wong, Hee-Kit [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Sch Hlth Serv, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; natural history; Cobb angle; curve progression; skeletal maturity; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9431
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This is a follow-up study to skeletal maturity on a cohort of students screened for a 1-year prospective epidemiological prevalence study for scoliosis. Objectives. This study aims to identify the prognostic factors for curve progression to a magnitude of 30 at skeletal maturity in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis is not well understood. Previous reports have focused on the characteristics of curve progression where progression has been predefined at specific angles of 5 degrees to 6 degrees. However, the absolute curve magnitude at skeletal maturity is more predictive of long-term curve behavior rather than curve progression of a defined magnitude over shorter periods of skeletal growth. It is generally agreed that curves less than 30 are highly unlikely to progress after skeletal maturity. Hence, defining the factors that influence curve progression to an absolute magnitude of more than 30 at skeletal maturity would more significantly aid clinical practice. Methods. One hundred eighty-six patients who fulfilled the study criteria were selected from an initial 279 patients with idiopathic scoliosis detected by school screening, and who were followed-up till skeletal maturity. The initial age, gender, pubertal status, and initial curve magnitude were used as risk factors to predict the probability of curve progression to more than 30 at skeletal maturity. Results. Curve magnitude at first presentation was the most important predictive factor for curve progression to a magnitude of more than 30 at skeletal maturity. An initial Cobb angle of 25 had the best receiver-operating characteristic of 0.80 with a positive predictive value of 68.4% and a negative predictive value of 91.9% for curve progression to 30 or more at skeletal maturity. Conclusion. Initial Cobb angle magnitude is the most important predictor of long-term curve progression and behavior past skeletal maturity. We suggest an initial Cobb angle of 25 as an important threshold magnitude for long-term curve progression. Initial age, gender, and pubertal status were less important prognostic factors in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 700
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF FUSED AND UNFUSED IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    EDGAR, MA
    MEHTA, MH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (05): : 712 - 716
  • [32] Anterior instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: A minimum follow-up of 10 years
    Otani, K
    Saito, M
    Sibasaki, K
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1997, 21 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [33] Is routine postoperative radiologic follow-up justified in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Vila-Casademunt A.
    Pellisé F.
    Domingo-Sàbat M.
    Bagó J.
    Matamalas A.
    Villanueva C.
    Càceres E.
    Spine Deformity, 2013, 1 (3) : 223 - 228
  • [34] EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Brice Ilharreborde
    Emmanuelle Ferrero
    Marianne Alison
    Keyvan Mazda
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 526 - 531
  • [35] Estimated kyphosis and lordosis changes at follow-up in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
    Leroux, MA
    Zabjek, K
    Simard, G
    Rivard, CH
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 22 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [36] Abnormal Skeletal Growth Patterns in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Longitudinal Study Till Skeletal Maturity
    Yim, A. P. Y.
    Yeung, H. Y.
    Wang, W. J.
    Hung, V. W. Y.
    Qin, L.
    Lee, K. M.
    Lam, T. P.
    Qiu, Y.
    Cheng, J. C. Y.
    RESEARCH INTO SPINAL DEFORMITIES 8, 2012, 176 : 474 - 474
  • [37] Anterior instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum follow-up of 10 years
    K. Otani
    M. Saito
    K. Sibasaki
    International Orthopaedics, 1997, 21 : 4 - 8
  • [38] EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Ilharreborde, Brice
    Ferrero, Emmanuelle
    Alison, Marianne
    Mazda, Keyvan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (02) : 526 - 531
  • [39] FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF FORCES ACTING ON MILWAUKEE BRACE ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    MULCAHY, T
    GALANTE, J
    DEWALD, R
    SCHULTZ, A
    HUNTER, JC
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1973, (93) : 53 - 68
  • [40] Success Rate of Brace Treatment for Juvenile-Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis up to Skeletal Maturity
    Babaee, Taher
    Kamyab, Mojtaba
    Ganjavian, Mohammad Saleh
    Rouhani, Naeimeh
    Jarvis, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (05): : 824 - 831