Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis Follow-up Study to Skeletal Maturity

被引:90
|
作者
Tan, Ken-Jin [1 ]
Moe, Maung Maung [1 ]
Vaithinathan, Rose [2 ]
Wong, Hee-Kit [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Sch Hlth Serv, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; natural history; Cobb angle; curve progression; skeletal maturity; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9431
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This is a follow-up study to skeletal maturity on a cohort of students screened for a 1-year prospective epidemiological prevalence study for scoliosis. Objectives. This study aims to identify the prognostic factors for curve progression to a magnitude of 30 at skeletal maturity in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis is not well understood. Previous reports have focused on the characteristics of curve progression where progression has been predefined at specific angles of 5 degrees to 6 degrees. However, the absolute curve magnitude at skeletal maturity is more predictive of long-term curve behavior rather than curve progression of a defined magnitude over shorter periods of skeletal growth. It is generally agreed that curves less than 30 are highly unlikely to progress after skeletal maturity. Hence, defining the factors that influence curve progression to an absolute magnitude of more than 30 at skeletal maturity would more significantly aid clinical practice. Methods. One hundred eighty-six patients who fulfilled the study criteria were selected from an initial 279 patients with idiopathic scoliosis detected by school screening, and who were followed-up till skeletal maturity. The initial age, gender, pubertal status, and initial curve magnitude were used as risk factors to predict the probability of curve progression to more than 30 at skeletal maturity. Results. Curve magnitude at first presentation was the most important predictive factor for curve progression to a magnitude of more than 30 at skeletal maturity. An initial Cobb angle of 25 had the best receiver-operating characteristic of 0.80 with a positive predictive value of 68.4% and a negative predictive value of 91.9% for curve progression to 30 or more at skeletal maturity. Conclusion. Initial Cobb angle magnitude is the most important predictor of long-term curve progression and behavior past skeletal maturity. We suggest an initial Cobb angle of 25 as an important threshold magnitude for long-term curve progression. Initial age, gender, and pubertal status were less important prognostic factors in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 700
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Influence of Lumbar Muscle Volume on Curve Progression After Skeletal Maturity in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Long-Term Follow-up Study
    Watanabe K.
    Ohashi M.
    Hirano T.
    Katsumi K.
    Shoji H.
    Mizouchi T.
    Endo N.
    Hasegawa K.
    Spine Deformity, 2018, 6 (6) : 691 - 698.e1
  • [2] Improving prediction of progression of idiopathic scoliosis based on curve size and skeletal maturity
    Neal, Kevin M.
    Boeyer, Melanie
    Craver, Emily C.
    Crook, Julia E.
    Kiebzak, Gary M.
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024, 12 (06) : 1657 - 1665
  • [3] Thoracoscopic Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Follow-up Curve Behavior According to Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging
    Alanay, Ahmet
    Yucekul, Altug
    Abul, Kadir
    Ergene, Gokhan
    Senay, Sahin
    Ay, Binnaz
    Cebeci, Barbaros Omer
    Dikmen, Pinar Yalinay
    Zulemyan, Tais
    Yavuz, Yasemin
    Yilgor, Caglar
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (22) : E1483 - E1492
  • [4] Prediction of Curve Progression in Idiopathic Scoliosis Validation of the Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System
    Sitoula, Prakash
    Verma, Kushagra
    Holmes, Laurens, Jr.
    Gabos, Peter G.
    Sanders, James O.
    Yorgova, Petya
    Neiss, Geraldine
    Rogers, Kenneth
    Shah, Suken A.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (13) : 1006 - 1013
  • [5] Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis
    Sanders, James O.
    Browne, Richard H.
    McConnell, Sharon J.
    Margraf, Susan A.
    Cooney, Timothy E.
    Finegold, David N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (01): : 64 - 73
  • [6] FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
    KOLINDSORENSEN, V
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1973, 44 (01): : 98 - 98
  • [7] An analysis of the effect of Harrington instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A follow-up study revealing some skeletal and soft tissues involved in curve progression
    Wojcik, AS
    Webb, JK
    Burwell, RG
    Cole, AA
    RESEARCH INTO SPINAL DEFORMITIES 1, 1997, 37 : 133 - 135
  • [8] Curve progression in non-surgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a cohort study with 40-year follow-up
    Dragsted, Casper
    Ragborg, Laerke
    Ohrt-nissen, Soren
    Andersen, Thomas
    Gehrchen, Martin
    Dahl, Benny
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2025, 96 : 110 - 115
  • [9] QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND FOR PREDICTING CURVE PROGRESSION IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 294 CASES FOLLOWED-UP BEYOND SKELETAL MATURITY
    Lam, Tsz Ping
    Hung, Vivian Wing Yin
    Yeung, Hiu Yan
    Chu, Winnie Chiu Wing
    Ng, Bobby Kin Wah
    Lee, Kwong Man
    Qin, Ling
    Cheng, Jack Chun Yiu
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (03): : 381 - 387
  • [10] Predicting Factors at Skeletal Maturity for Curve Progression and Low Back Pain in Adult Patients Treated Nonoperatively for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Curves A Mean 25-year Follow-up
    Ohashi, Masayuki
    Watanabe, Kei
    Hirano, Toru
    Hasegawa, Kazuhiro
    Katsumi, Keiichi
    Shoji, Hirokazu
    Mizouchi, Tatsuki
    Endo, Naoto
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (23) : E1403 - E1411