Association between Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Breast in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Outcome of Patients with Unilateral Invasive Breast Cancer

被引:67
|
作者
van der Velden, Bas H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Dmitriev, Ivan [1 ,2 ]
Loo, Claudette E. [3 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [2 ]
Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CONSERVING THERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; DCE-MRI; IMPACT; DENSITY; LESIONS; SURGERY; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.15142192
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively investigate whether parenchymal enhancement in dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the contralateral breast in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer is associated with therapy outcome. Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval of the institutional review board and patients' written informed consent, 531 women with unilateral invasive breast cancer underwent dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging between 2000 and 2008. The contralateral parenchyma was segmented automatically, in which the mean of the top 10% late enhancement was calculated. Cox regression was used to test associations between parenchymal enhancement, patient and tumor characteristics, and overall survival and invasive disease-free survival. Subset analyses were performed and stratified according to immunohistochemical subtypes and type of adjuvant treatment received. Results: Median follow-up was 86 months. Age (P < .001) and immunohistochemical subtype (P = .042) retained significance in multivariate analysis for overall survival. In patients with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (n = 398), age (P < .001), largest diameter on MR images (P = .049), and parenchymal enhancement (P = .011) were significant. In patients who underwent endocrine therapy (n = 174), parenchymal enhancement was the only significant covariate for overall survival and invasive disease-free survival (P < .001). Conclusion: Results suggest that parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral breast of patients with invasive unilateral breast cancer is significantly associated with long-term outcome, particularly in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Lower value of the mean top 10% enhancement of the parenchyma shows potential as a predictive biomarker for relatively poor outcome in patients who undergo endocrine therapy. These results should, however, be validated in a larger study. (C) RSNA, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 685
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association between parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral breast in DCE-MRI and outcome of patients with unilateral breast cancer
    van der Velden, B. H. M.
    Dmitriev, I.
    Loo, C. E.
    Gilhuijs, K. G. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S42 - S43
  • [2] The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Saracco, Ariel
    Strand, Fredrik
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sundbom, Ann
    Hall, Per
    Dickman, Paul W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (12) : 1600 - 1607
  • [3] Association between contralateral background parenchymal enhancement on MRI and outcome in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Rella, Rossella
    Bu, Enida
    Belli, Paolo
    Scrofani, Anna Rita
    Petta, Federica
    Borghetti, Alberto
    Marazzi, Fabio
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (10) : 486 - 494
  • [4] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Moon, Marianne
    Cornfeld, Daniel
    Weinreb, Jeffrey
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 351 - +
  • [5] Breast cancer in dense breast: Detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging
    Kawashima, H
    Matsui, O
    Suzuki, M
    Kadoya, M
    Tawara, M
    Nonomura, A
    Noguchi, M
    Takashima, T
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 11 (03): : 233 - 243
  • [6] Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging
    Sogani, Julie
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Kaplan, Jennifer B.
    D'Alessio, Donna
    Goldman, Debra
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions
    Pediconi, Federica
    Catalano, Carlo
    Roselli, Antonella
    Padula, Simona
    Altomari, Fiorella
    Moriconi, Enrica
    Pronio, Anna Maria
    Kirchin, Miles A.
    Passariello, Roberto
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (03) : 670 - 680
  • [8] Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in evaluating the association between contralateral parenchymal enhancement and survival outcome in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer
    Shin, Gi Won
    Zhang, Yang
    Kim, Min Jung
    Su, Min-Ying
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Moon, Hee Jung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Park, Vivian Youngjean
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (06) : 1678 - 1689
  • [9] Association between rim enhancement of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and patient outcome: impact of subtype
    Alexander M. Th. Schmitz
    Claudette E. Loo
    Jelle Wesseling
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 148 : 541 - 551
  • [10] Association between rim enhancement of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and patient outcome: impact of subtype
    Schmitz, Alexander M. Th
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Wesseling, Jelle
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 148 (03) : 541 - 551