Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome

被引:399
|
作者
Nahabedian, MY
Momen, B
Galdino, G
Manson, PN
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Nat Resources Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200208000-00015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent reports of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap indicate increased fat necrosis and venous congestion as compared with the free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Although the benefits of the DIE P flap regarding the abdominal wall are well documented, its reconstructive advantage remains uncertain. The main objective of this study was to address selection criteria for the free TRAM and DIEP flaps on the basis of patient characteristics and vascular anatomy of the flap that might minimize flap morbidity. A total of 163 free TRAM or DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 135 women between 1997 and 2000. Four levels of muscle sparing related to the rectus abdominis muscle were used. The free TRAM flap was performed on 118 women, of whom 93 were unilateral and 25 were bilateral, totaling 143 flaps. The DIEP flap procedure was performed on 17 women, of whom 14 were unilateral and three were bilateral, totaling 20 flaps. Morbidities related to the 143 free TRAM flaps included return to the operating room for I I flaps (7.7 percent), total necrosis in five flaps (3.5 percent), mild fat necrosis in 14 flaps (9.8 percent), mild venous congestion in two flaps (1.4 percent), and lower abdominal bulge in eight women (6.8 percent). Partial flap necrosis did not occur. Morbidities related to the 20 DIEP flaps included return to the operating room for three flaps (15 percent), total necrosis in one flap (5 percent), and mild fat necrosis in two flaps (10 percent). Partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, and a lower abdominal bulge were not observed. Selection of the free TRAM or DIEP flap should be made on the basis of patient weight, quantity of abdominal fat, and breast. volume requirement, and on the number, caliber, and location of the perforating vessels. Occurrence of venous congestion and total flap loss in the free TRAM and DIEP flaps appears to be independent of the patientage, weight, degree of muscle sparing, and tobacco rise. The occurrence of fat necrosis is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) but not related to patient age or preservation of the rectus abdominis muscle. The ability to perform a sit-tip is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) and patient age (p < 0.001) but not related to preservation Of the muscle or intercostal nerves. The incidence of lower abdominal bulge is reduced after DIET flap reconstruction (p < 0.001). The DIET flap can be an excellent option for properly selected women.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 475
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The free TRAM flap as a standard procedure for breast reconstruction
    Voigt, M
    Andree, C
    Galla, TJ
    Borges, J
    Stark, GB
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2001, 61 (06) : 384 - 390
  • [22] IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION USING THE FREE TRAM FLAP
    GROTTING, JC
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 21 (02) : 207 - 221
  • [23] Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction
    Knight, Mark A. K.
    Nguyen, Dinh T., IV
    Kobayashi, Mark R.
    Evans, Gregory R. D.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (06) : 593 - 598
  • [24] Free perforator crossover TRAM flap for breast reconstruction
    Lam, TC
    Sellars, GD
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 50 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [25] Immediate breast reconstruction with free microvascular TRAM flap
    Gabka, CJ
    Maiwald, G
    Theodorou, D
    Bohmert, H
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1996, : 101 - 104
  • [26] Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, Latissimus Flap, and Implant Techniques
    Yueh, Janet H.
    Slavin, Sumner A.
    Adesiyun, Tolulope
    Nyame, Theodore T.
    Gautam, Shiva
    Morris, Donald J.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (06) : 1585 - 1595
  • [27] TRAM and DIEP flap zones
    Rickard, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 54 (03): : 272 - 273
  • [28] Analysis of Predictors of Perforator Selection in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Ouyang, Yiye
    Li, Chengcheng
    Du, Xingyi
    Liu, Chunjun
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (01) : 141E - 141E
  • [29] Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast re constructions - Discussion
    Wilkins, EG
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (06) : 1417 - 1418
  • [30] The Low DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Yim, Ji Hong
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (03)