Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models

被引:273
|
作者
Gagne, Phill
Hancock, Gregory R.
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Educ Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Measurement Stat & Evaluat, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Sample size recommendations in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) have recently shifted away from observations per variable or per parameter toward consideration of model quality. Extending research by Marsh, Hau, Balla, and Grayson (1998), simulations were conducted to determine the extent to which CFA model convergence and parameter estimation are affected by n as well as by construct reliability, which is a measure of measurement model quality derived from the number of indicators per factor (p/f) and factor loading magnitude. Results indicated that model convergence and accuracy of parameter estimation were affected by n and by construct reliability within levels of n. Sample size recommendations for applied researchers using CFA are presented herein as a function of relevant design characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 83
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Confirmatory factor analysis of single- and multiple-factor competing models of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical sample
    Stockdale, GD
    Gridley, BE
    Balogh, DW
    Holtgraves, T
    ASSESSMENT, 2002, 9 (01) : 94 - 106
  • [32] Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ-12: A large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis
    Shevlin, M
    Adamson, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 17 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [33] A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL OF QUALITY OF LIFE CONTAINING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DOMAINS
    Dzuka, Jozef
    Schmitt, Manfred
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2016, 60 (04): : 430 - 437
  • [34] The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination
    Hogarty, KY
    Hines, CV
    Kromrey, JD
    Ferron, JM
    Mumford, KR
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 65 (02) : 202 - 226
  • [35] Degrees of Freedom in Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analyses Are Models of Measurement Invariance Testing Correctly Specified?
    Schroeders, Ulrich
    Gnambs, Timo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 36 (01) : 105 - 113
  • [36] Sample size determination when conducting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA): how sample size, scale characteristics, data characteristics and estimation methods affect fit indexes?
    Anthoine, Emmanuelle
    Moret, Leila
    Sebille, Veronique
    Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 165 - 165
  • [37] Developing measurement model using Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis in suppressing maternal mortality
    Otok, B. W.
    Purnami, S. W.
    Andari, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2015, 53 (06): : 130 - 136
  • [38] Measurement Structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-24 in a Sample of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Pain: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    Chiu, Chung-Yi
    Jochman, Joseph
    Fujikawa, Mayu
    Strand, David
    Cheing, Gladys
    Lee, Gloria
    Chan, Fong
    REHABILITATION RESEARCH POLICY AND EDUCATION, 2014, 28 (02): : 80 - 90
  • [39] Confirmatory Factor Analytic Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents in a Longitudinal Sample of Adolescents
    Ng, Zi Jia
    Huebner, E. Scott
    Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto
    Hills, Kimberly J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 37 (02) : 139 - 153
  • [40] Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis
    Hair, Joe F., Jr.
    Howard, Matt C.
    Nitzl, Christian
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 109 : 101 - 110