Failure analysis of a pressure vessel subjected to an internal blast load

被引:14
|
作者
Barsoum, I. [1 ]
Lawal, S. A. [1 ]
Simmons, R. J. [2 ]
Rodrigues, C. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, POB 2533, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, POB 2533, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Finite element analysis; Failure locus; Blast load; Rupture; Overpressure; Pressure vessel; HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS; STRESS; MECHANISMS; STRAIN; PLATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.037
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The objective of the current work is to model a stainless steel (SA 316L) autoclave explosion and rupture that occurred during a research laboratory experiment designed to study the thermal decomposition of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate in the presence of dimethylsulfoxide (DSMO) in the autoclave. A finite element analysis is conducted to better understand the cause of failure of the autoclave and with the objective to investigate whether the incident was caused by static overpressure or an internal blast load. The empirical CONWEP blast loading model is used to model the internal blast load. The constitutive behavior of the autoclave material is modelled using the Johnson-Cook (JC) plasticity and material failure model, which both account for the effect of strain rate and temperature. By conducting uniaxial tensile tests and tests on notched ring specimens cut from the autoclave, the true stress-strain curve and the ductile failure locus of the autoclave material are established, respectively, which are used to obtain the constants of the JC plasticity and failure model, respectively. The result of the finite element analysis revealed that a blast load from an equivalent TNT charge of 0.042 kg, which resulted from the decomposition of DMSO at high temperature, predicted markedly well the structural response and subsequent failure of the autoclave observed in the post-incident investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 369
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overview of pressure vessel design criteria for internal detonation (blast) loading
    Duffey, T.A.
    Rodriguez, E.A.
    Welding Research Council, Progress Reports, 2001, 56 (7-8): : 74 - 89
  • [22] Finite Element Investigation on the Performance of Pressure Vessel Subjected to Structural Load
    Salins, Sampath Suranjan
    Mohan, Mahesh
    Stephen, Clifton
    ANNALES DE CHIMIE-SCIENCE DES MATERIAUX, 2021, 45 (03): : 201 - 205
  • [23] Failure analysis of architectural glazing subjected to blast loading
    Wei, Jun
    Shetty, Mahesh S.
    Dharani, Lokeswarappa R.
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2006, 13 (07) : 1029 - 1043
  • [24] Numerical analysis of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to blast load
    Abd-El-Nabi, Eslam
    El-Helloty, Arafa
    Summra, Aymen
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2023, 24 (03) : 3727 - 3743
  • [25] Dynamic analysis of subway station subjected to internal blast loading
    何伟
    陈健云
    郭靖
    JournalofCentralSouthUniversityofTechnology, 2011, 18 (03) : 917 - 924
  • [26] DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND TUNNELS SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL BLAST LOADING
    Tiwari, Rohit
    Chakraborty, Tanusree
    Matsagar, Vasant
    11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; 5TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; 6TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, VOLS V - VI, 2014, : 6667 - 6678
  • [27] Dynamic analysis of subway station subjected to internal blast loading
    Wei He
    Jian-yun Chen
    Jing Guo
    Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18 : 917 - 924
  • [28] Dynamic analysis of subway station subjected to internal blast loading
    He Wei
    Chen Jian-yun
    Guo Jing
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03): : 917 - 924
  • [29] Analysis of curved tunnels in soil subjected to internal blast loading
    Rohit Tiwari
    Tanusree Chakraborty
    Vasant Matsagar
    Acta Geotechnica, 2020, 15 : 509 - 528
  • [30] Dynamic Analysis of Tunnel in Soil Subjected to Internal Blast Loading
    Tiwari R.
    Chakraborty T.
    Matsagar V.
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35 (4) : 1491 - 1512