Case study: Phase-component amplitude variation with angle

被引:4
|
作者
De Abreu, Elita Selmara [1 ]
Castagna, John Patrick [1 ]
Gil, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Lumina Technol Inc, Res & Dev, Houston, TX USA
关键词
AVO; FREQUENCY; THIN;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2018-0762.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In detectable and isolated thin layers below seismic resolution, phase decomposition can theoretically be used to discriminate relatively high-impedance thin-layer responses from low-impedance reservoir responses. Phase decomposition can be used to isolate seismic amplitudes with a particular phase response or to decompose the seismic trace into symmetrical and antisymmetrical phase components. These components sum to form the original trace. Assuming zero-phase seismic data and normal American polarity, seismically thin layers that are high impedance relative to overlying and underlying half-spaces are seen on the +90 degrees phase component, whereas a relatively low-impedance thin layer will appear on the -90 degrees phase component. When such phase decomposition is applied to prestack attributes on a 2D line across a thin, 8 m thick, gas-saturated reservoir in theWestern Canadian Sedimentary Basin of Alberta, Canada, amplitudevariation-with-angle is magnified on the -90 degrees phase component. The -90 degrees far-offset component allows the lateral extent of the reservoir to be better delineated. This amplification is also seen on the -90 degrees phase component of the gradient attribute. These results are corroborated by seismic modeling that indicates the same phase-component relationships for nearand far-angle stacks as are observed on the real data. Fluid substitution and seismic modeling indicate that, relative to full-phase data, the mixed-phase response observed in this study exhibits variations in fluid effects that are magnified and better observed at far angles on the -90 degrees phase component.
引用
收藏
页码:B285 / B297
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Viscoelastic amplitude variation with offset equations with account taken of jumps in attenuation angle
    Moradi, Shahpoor
    Innanen, Kristopher A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 81 (03) : N17 - N29
  • [42] Identification of morphologies of gas hydrate distribution based on amplitude variation with angle analysis
    Liu, Tao
    Liu, Xuewei
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (03) : B143 - B154
  • [43] Amplitude Variation with Angle Inversion for New Parameterized Porosity and Fluid Bulk Modulus
    Li, Shengjun
    Liu, Bingyang
    Gao, Jianhu
    Chen, Huaizhen
    GEOFLUIDS, 2021, 2021
  • [44] STUDY OF AMPLITUDE-PHASE CHARACTERISTICS OF DIELECTRIC MIRRORS FOR CASE OF ABSORBING LAYERS
    KLEMENTYEVA, AY
    TIKHONRAVOV, AV
    VESTNIK MOSKOVSKOGO UNIVERSITETA SERIYA 3 FIZIKA ASTRONOMIYA, 1978, 19 (03): : 75 - 81
  • [45] Three beams Phase-shifting interferometry by their amplitude variation
    Meneses-Fabian, Cruz
    Rivera-Ortega, Uriel
    EIGHTH SYMPOSIUM OPTICS IN INDUSTRY, 2011, 8287
  • [46] Statistical tests for changes in the amplitude, frequency or phase of a sinusoidal variation
    Koen, Chris
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 392 (01) : 190 - 204
  • [47] Control of the wave amplitude by phase mismatching variation in CARS spectroscopy
    Fishman, AI
    Skvortsov, AI
    JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY, 2000, 31 (8-9) : 739 - 742
  • [48] Voltage Phase Angle Variation in Relation to Wind Power
    Allen, A. J.
    Santoso, S.
    Grady, W. M.
    IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING 2010, 2010,
  • [49] Amplitude and phase beam shaping for highest sensitivity in sidewall angle detection
    Cisotto, Luca
    Urbach, H. Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2017, 34 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [50] A new Fourier azimuthal amplitude variation fracture characterization method: Case study in the Haynesville Shale
    Barone, Anthony
    Sen, Mrinal K.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (01) : WA101 - WA120