Etanercept and sulfasalazine, alone and combined, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving sulfasalazine: a double-blind comparison

被引:92
|
作者
Combe, B.
Codreanu, C.
Fiocco, U.
Gaubitz, M.
Geusens, P. P.
Kvien, T. K.
Pavelka, K.
Sambrook, P. N.
Smolen, J. S.
Wajdula, J.
Fatenejad, S.
机构
[1] Wyeth Ayerst Res, Clin Res & Dev, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
[2] Hop Lapeyronie, Serv Immunorhumatol, F-34059 Montpellier, France
[3] Ctr Metodol Reumatol, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Univ Padua Polyclin, Cattedra & Div Reumatol, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Munster, Med Clin B, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[6] Hasselt Univ, Biomed Res Ctr, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[7] Diakonhjemmet Hosp Oslo, Dept Rheumatol, Oslo, Norway
[8] Inst Rheumatol, Prague, Czech Republic
[9] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[10] Krankenhaus Lainz, Dept Med 2, Linz, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1136/ard.2005.049650
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept and sulfasalazine, alone and in combination, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite sulfasalazine treatment. Methods: A double-blind, randomised study in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable sulfasalazine (2-3 g/day) treatment. The primary end point was a 20% response by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 24 weeks. Results: At baseline, the three treatment groups (sulfasalazine, n = 50; etanercept, n = 103; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n = 101) were comparable for demographic variables and disease activity. Lack of efficacy was the primary reason for discontinuation (sulfasalazine, n = 12; etanercept, n = 1; etanercept and sulfasalazine, n=4; p < 0.001). Significantly more patients receiving etanercept, alone or in combination (74% for each), achieved ACR 20 responses at 24 weeks than those receiving sulfasalazine (28%; p < 0.01). Similarly, more patients in the etanercept groups achieved ACR 50 and ACR 70 responses than those in the sulfasalazine group (p < 0.01). In the groups receiving etanercept, significant differences in the ACR core components were observed by week 2 compared with those receiving sulfasalazine alone (p < 0.01). The incidences of several common adverse events (headache, nausea, asthenia) were lower with etanercept alone than with the combination (p < 0.05), but infections and injection site reactions were higher with etanercept alone (p < 0.05). The safety profiles of both etanercept treatment groups were comparable with previous experience of etanercept. Conclusions: For all efficacy variables assessed, etanercept alone or in combination with sulfasalazine resulted in substantial and similar improvement in disease activity from baseline to week 24 compared with sulfasalazine alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite their sulfasalazine treatment. All three treatments were generally well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF AZATHIOPRINE AND SULFASALAZINE IN IDIOPATHIC PROCTOCOLITIS - PRELIMINARY REPORT
    CAPRILLI, R
    CARRATU, R
    BABBINI, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1975, 20 (02): : 115 - 120
  • [32] SULFASALAZINE THERAPY FOR PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    GUPTA, AK
    GROBER, JS
    HAMILTON, TA
    ELLIS, CN
    SIEGEL, MT
    VOORHEES, JJ
    MCCUNE, WJ
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 22 (05) : 894 - 898
  • [33] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF AZATHIOPRINE AND SULFASALAZINE IN IDIOPATHIC PROCT-COLITIS
    CAPRILLI, R
    CARRATU, R
    BABBINI, M
    RENDICONTI DI GASTRO-ENTEROLOGIA, 1973, 5 (03): : 224 - 224
  • [34] SULFASALAZINE IN EARLY RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - A 48-WEEK DOUBLE-BLIND, PROSPECTIVE, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    HANNONEN, P
    MOTTONEN, T
    HAKOLA, M
    OKA, M
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1993, 36 (11): : 1501 - 1509
  • [35] Results of patient-reported outcomes in a 3-year double-blind study of etanercept (Enbrel®) and methotrexate, alone and combined, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis:: TEMPO trial
    Singh, A
    Kjareskog, L
    Pedersen, R
    Fatenejad, S
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2005, 52 (09): : S233 - S233
  • [36] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis despite DMARD therapy
    Hobbs, Kathryn
    Deodhar, Atul
    Wang, Brian
    Bitman, Bojena
    Nussbaum, Joyce
    Chung, James
    Collier, David H.
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4 : 1 - 7
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: Comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis
    Smolen, JS
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 28 : 15 - 21
  • [38] EFFECTS OF SULFASALAZINE ON FECAL FLORA IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - A COMPARISON WITH PENICILLAMINE
    NEUMANN, VC
    SHINEBAUM, R
    COOKE, EM
    WRIGHT, V
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1987, 26 (05): : 334 - 337
  • [39] SULFASALAZINE THERAPY FOR PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    GROBER, JS
    MCCUNE, WJ
    GUPTA, AK
    ELLIS, CN
    SIEGEL, MT
    VOORHEES, JJ
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 39 (02): : A309 - A309
  • [40] Treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide: two year follow up of a double blind, placebo controlled trial versus sulfasalazine
    Scott, DL
    Smolen, JS
    Kalden, JR
    van de Putte, LBA
    Larsen, A
    Kvien, TK
    Schattenkirchner, M
    Nash, P
    Oed, C
    Loew-Friedrich, I
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2001, 60 (10) : 913 - 923