Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings

被引:3
|
作者
Bacon, Caren [1 ]
Malone, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Prewitt, Kim [1 ]
Hackett, Rachel [1 ]
Hastings, Molly [1 ]
Dexter, Sarah [1 ]
Luke, Douglas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ St Louis, Ctr Publ Hlth Syst Sci, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO USA
来源
关键词
sustainability capacity; implementation science; program sustainability; evidence-based interventions; community; health; PUBLIC-HEALTH; FIT;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2022.1004167
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice. Methods: The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs. Results: The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level. Discussion: The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of evidence-based interventions: analyzing critical components for sustainability in community mental health services
    Bergmark, Magnus
    Bejerholm, Ulrika
    Markstrom, Urban
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 17 (02) : 129 - 148
  • [32] Implications of evidence-based practice for community health
    Hausman, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 30 (03) : 453 - 467
  • [33] Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs for Schools and Communities
    Inman, Dianna D.
    van Bakergem, Karen M.
    LaRosa, Angela C.
    Garr, David R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 40 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [34] Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
    Matthew Chinman
    Joie Acosta
    Patricia Ebener
    Patrick S. Malone
    Mary E. Slaughter
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [35] Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
    Chinman, Matthew
    Acosta, Joie
    Ebener, Patricia
    Malone, Patrick S.
    Slaughter, Mary E.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [36] Determinants of Community Coalition Ability to Support Evidence-Based Programs
    Brown, Louis D.
    Feinberg, Mark E.
    Greenberg, Mark T.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2010, 11 (03) : 287 - 297
  • [37] Availability of Evidence-Based Community Falls Prevention Programs: Considerations
    Tripken, Jennifer L.
    Cameron, Kathleen A.
    Eagen, Thomas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 (11) : 2426 - 2427
  • [38] Raising awareness of evidence-based physical activity programs in the community
    Cowan, P.
    Hefelfinger, J.
    Brady, T.
    Odom, E.
    Oliver, A.
    Brick, M.
    Bemis-Dougherty, A.
    Berktold, J.
    Loomis, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : S93 - S93
  • [39] Determinants of Community Coalition Ability to Support Evidence-Based Programs
    Louis D. Brown
    Mark E. Feinberg
    Mark T. Greenberg
    [J]. Prevention Science, 2010, 11 : 287 - 297
  • [40] The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    Cooper, Brittany Rhoades
    Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 39, 2018, 39 : 55 - 76