QSO-LRG two-point cross-correlation function and redshift-space distortions

被引:0
|
作者
Mountrichas, G. [1 ]
Sawangwit, U. [1 ]
Shanks, T. [1 ]
Croom, S. M. [2 ]
Schneider, D. P. [3 ]
Myers, A. D. [4 ]
Pimbblet, K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Phys, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Astron & Astrophys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Astron, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Univ Queensland, Dept Phys, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
galaxies: clusters: general; quasars: general; cosmology: observations; large-scale structure of Universe; DIGITAL SKY SURVEY; 2DF-SDSS LRG; EVOLUTION; MODEL; GALAXIES; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14456.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We have measured the bias of QSOs as a function of QSO luminosity at fixed redshift (z < I) by cross-correlating them With luminous red galaxies (LRGs) in the same spatial volume, hence breaking the degeneracy between QSO luminosity and redshift. We use three QSO samples from 2SLAQ, 2QZ and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) covering a QSO absolute magnitude range, -24.5 < M-bJ < -21.5, and cross-correlate them with 2SLAQ (z approximate to 0.5) and AAOmega (z approximate to 0.7) photometric and spectroscopic LRGs in the same redshift ranges. The spectroscopic QSO samples, in the spectroscopic LRG areas, contain up to 700 QSOs and in photometric LRG areas up to 7000 QSOs. The 2D and 3D cross-clustering measurements are generally in good agreement. Our (2SLAQ) QSO-LRG clustering amplitude (r(0) = 6.98 +/- 0.6 h(-1) Mpc) as measured from the semiprojected cross-correlation function appears similar to the (2SLAQ) LRG-LRG autocorrelation amplitude (r(0) = 7.45 +/- 0.35 h(-1) MPC) and both are higher than the (2QZ + 2SLAQ) QSO-QSO amplitude (r(0) approximate to 5.0 h(-1) Mpc). Our measurements show remarkably little QSO-LRG cross-clustering dependence oil QSO luminosity. This result is unexpected on the basis of simple high-peak biasing models, where more luminous QSOs, are assumed to occupy rarer and so more clustered high-mass peaks. Assuming a standard ACDM model and values for b(LRG) measured from LRG autocorrelation analyses, from the spectroscopic samples at z approximate to 0.55 we find b(Q) = 2.3 +/- 0.5 at M-bJ approximate to -24 and b(Q) = 1.6 +/- 0.3 at M-bJ approximate to -22. Averaging over all the spectroscopic and photometric samples, we find an average value of b(Q) = 1.8 +/- 0.1 at z approximate to 0.6 and M-bJ approximate to -23. The implied dark matter halo mass inhabited by QSOs is approximate to 1013 h(-1) M-circle dot again approximately independent ofQSO luminosity. We have also made a z-space distortion analysis of the QSO-LRG cross-clustering at z approximate to 0.55. The velocity dispersion fitted to QSO-LRG cross-correlation, xi(sigma, pi), at +/- 600 km s(-1) is close to that expected given the larger QSO redshift errors. The dynamical in fall result for the combined 2SLAQ, 2QZ and SDSS QSO sample gives beta(Q) = 0.23 +/- 0.15 which implies b(Q) = 3.2 +/- 2.1, assuming the standard cosmological model. Although noisier, this latter value is consistent with the value of b(Q) = 1.9 +/- 0.2 obtained from the amplitude of the cross-correlation function in the same redshift range.
引用
收藏
页码:2050 / 2064
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gravitational redshift in the void-galaxy cross-correlation function in redshift space
    Nan, Yue
    Yamamoto, Kazuhiro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2018, 98 (04)
  • [22] Wide-angle redshift-space distortions at quasi-linear scales: cross-correlation functions from Zel'dovich approximation
    Taruya, Atsushi
    Saga, Shohei
    Breton, Michel-Andres
    Rasera, Yann
    Fujita, Tomohiro
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 491 (03) : 4162 - 4179
  • [23] The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function
    Croom, SM
    Boyle, BJ
    Shanks, T
    Smith, RJ
    Miller, L
    Outram, PJ
    Loaring, NS
    Hoyle, F
    da Angela, A
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 356 (02) : 415 - 438
  • [24] Redshift-space effects in voids and their impact on cosmological tests - II. The void-galaxy cross-correlation function
    Correa, Carlos M.
    Paz, Dante J.
    Padilla, Nelson D.
    Sanchez, Ariel G.
    Ruiz, Andres N.
    Angulo, Raul E.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 509 (02) : 1871 - 1884
  • [25] The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey -: VII.: Constraining cosmology from redshift-space distortions via ξ (σ, π )
    Hoyle, F
    Outram, PJ
    Shanks, T
    Boyle, BJ
    Croom, SM
    Smith, RJ
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 332 (02) : 311 - 324
  • [26] The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey -: VI.: Measuring Λ and β from redshift-space distortions in the power spectrum
    Outram, PJ
    Hoyle, F
    Shanks, T
    Boyle, BJ
    Croom, SM
    Loaring, NS
    Miller, L
    Smith, RJ
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 328 (01) : 174 - 184
  • [27] A practical computational method for the anisotropic redshift-space three-point correlation function
    Slepian, Zachary
    Eisenstein, Daniel J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 478 (02) : 1468 - 1483
  • [28] Modelling the redshift-space three-point correlation function in SDSS-III
    Guo, Hong
    Zheng, Zheng
    Jing, Y. P.
    Zehavi, Idit
    Li, Cheng
    Weinberg, David H.
    Skibba, Ramin A.
    Nichol, Robert C.
    Rossi, Graziano
    Sabiu, Cristiano G.
    Schneider, Donald P.
    McBride, Cameron K.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 449 (01) : L95 - L99
  • [29] The two-point correlation function and morphological segregation in the optical redshift survey
    Hermit, S
    Santiago, BX
    Lahav, O
    Strauss, MA
    Davis, M
    Dressler, A
    Huchra, JP
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 283 (02) : 709 - 720
  • [30] Modelling the large-scale redshift-space 3-point correlation function of galaxies
    Slepian, Zachary
    Eisenstein, Daniel J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 469 (02) : 2059 - 2076