An Approach to Optimal Hyperspectral and Multispectral Signature and Image Fusion for Detecting Hidden Targets on Shorelines

被引:0
|
作者
Bostater, Charles R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Inst Technol, Coll Engn, Marine Environm Opt Lab, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
[2] Florida Inst Technol, Coll Engn, Ctr Remote Sensing, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
来源
关键词
image analysis; target detection; feature detection; calibration; hydrologic optics; airborne sensors; airborne imagery; hyperspectral sensing; multispectral imagery; radiative transfer; subsurface imaging; cameras; oil spills; data fusion; image contrast; derivative spectroscopy; shorelines; fusion protocol; fusion optimization;
D O I
10.1117/12.2196293
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Hyperspectral and multispectral imagery of shorelines collected from airborne and shipborne platforms are used following pushbroom imagery corrections using inertial motion motions units and augmented global positioning data and Kalman filtering. Corrected radiance or reflectance images are then used to optimize synthetic high spatial resolution spectral signatures resulting from an optimized data fusion process. The process demonstrated utilizes littoral zone features from imagery acquired in the Gulf of Mexico region. Shoreline imagery along the Banana River, Florida, is presented that utilizes a technique that makes use of numerically embedded targets in both higher spatial resolution multispectral images and lower spatial resolution hyperspectral imagery. The fusion process developed utilizes optimization procedures that include random selection of regions and pixels in the imagery, and minimizing the difference between the synthetic signatures and observed signatures. The optimized data fusion approach allows detection of spectral anomalies in the resolution enhanced data cubes. Spectral-spatial anomaly detection is demonstrated using numerically embedded line targets within actual imagery. The approach allows one to test spectral signature anomaly detection and to identify features and targets. The optimized data fusion techniques and software allows one to perform sensitivity analysis and optimization in the singular value decomposition model building process and the 2-D Butterworth cutoff frequency and order numerical selection process. The data fusion "synthetic imagery" forms a basis for spectral-spatial resolution enhancement for optimal band selection and remote sensing algorithm development within "spectral anomaly areas". Sensitivity analysis demonstrates the data fusion methodology is most sensitive to (a) the pixels and features used in the SVD model building process and (b) the 2-D Butterworth cutoff frequency optimized by application of K-S nonparametric test. The image fusion protocol is transferable to sensor data acquired from other platforms, including moving platforms as demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HyperFusion: A Computational Approach for Hyperspectral, Multispectral, and Panchromatic Image Fusion
    Tian, Xin
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Yuerong
    Wang, Zhongyuan
    Ma, Jiayi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [2] Compressive hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion
    Espitia, Oscar
    Castillo, Sergio
    Arguello, Henry
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XXII, 2016, 9840
  • [3] Research on Fusion Approach for Hyperspectral Image and Multispectral Image of HJ-1A
    Guo, Fenfen
    Fan, Jianrong
    Zang, Wendqian
    Liu, Fei
    Zhang, Huaizhen
    PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICEESD2011), PTS 1-5, 2012, 356-360 : 2897 - +
  • [4] Reciprocal transformer for hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion
    Ma, Qing
    Jiang, Junjun
    Liu, Xianming
    Ma, Jiayi
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 104
  • [5] HYPERSPECTRAL AND MULTISPECTRAL WASSERSTEIN BARYCENTER FOR IMAGE FUSION
    Mifdal, Jamila
    Coll, Bartomeu
    Courty, Nicolas
    Froment, Jacques
    Vedel, Beatrice
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2017, : 3373 - 3376
  • [6] A VARIATIONAL FORMULATION FOR HYPERSPECTRAL AND MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE FUSION
    Mifdal, Jamila
    Coll, Bartomeu
    Duran, Joan
    2018 25TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2018, : 3328 - 3332
  • [7] Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Fusion by MS/HS Fusion Net
    Xie, Qi
    Zhou, Minghao
    Zhao, Qian
    Meng, Deyu
    Zuo, Wangmeng
    Xu, Zongben
    2019 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2019), 2019, : 1585 - 1594
  • [8] Multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion in remote sensing: A survey
    Vivone, Gemine
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2023, 89 : 405 - 417
  • [9] Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion Based on Band Simulation
    Li, Xuelong
    Yuan, Yue
    Wang, Qi
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 17 (03) : 479 - 483
  • [10] Regularizing Hyperspectral and Multispectral Image Fusion by CNN Denoiser
    Dian, Renwei
    Li, Shutao
    Kang, Xudong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2021, 32 (03) : 1124 - 1135